{"id":258,"date":"2010-07-11T22:37:54","date_gmt":"2010-07-12T02:37:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/?page_id=258"},"modified":"2010-07-11T22:37:54","modified_gmt":"2010-07-12T02:37:54","slug":"safe-drinking-water-act","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/?page_id=258","title":{"rendered":"Safe Drinking Water Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Safe Drinking Water Act<\/h1>\n<p>FREE ESTIMATES<\/p>\n<p>Jacksonville\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Duval County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-346-1266<br \/>\nSt Augustine\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 St Johns County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-824-7144<br \/>\nOrange Park\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Clay County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-264-6444<br \/>\nJacksonville Beaches\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Duval County\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0904-246-3969<br \/>\nFernandina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nassau County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-277-3040<br \/>\nMacclenny\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Baker County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-259-5091<br \/>\nPalm Coast\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Flagler County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 386-439-5290<br \/>\nDaytona\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Volusia County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 386-253-4911<\/p>\n<p>GAINESVILLE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 ALACHUA COUNTY\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 352-335-8555<br \/>\nServing all of Florida \u00a0and Georgia\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 at \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0904-346-1266<\/p>\n<p><strong>EMAIL <\/strong><a href=\"mailto:LARRY@1STPROP.COM\">LARRY@1STPROP.COM<\/a> (feel free to email your bidding packages here)<\/p>\n<h2>GENERAL GUIDE TO PROVISIONS<\/h2>\n<div>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"TOP\">Environmental Protection Agency<br \/>\nOffice of Ground Water and Drinking Water<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">August 1996<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em> The Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 (PL   104-182) establish a new charter for the nation&#8217;s public water systems, States, and the   Environmental Protection Agency in protecting the safety of drinking water.  The amendments   include, among other things, new prevention approaches, improved consumer information,   changes to improve the regulatory program, and funding for States and local water systems.    President Clinton signed the Amendments on   August 6, 1996.  Copies are available from the Government Printing Office (tel. 202\/512-1808;   fax 202\/512-2250).<\/p>\n<p>This General Guide provides a subject-indexed overview of   the new amendments.  The guide will be supplemented with additional summaries and explanatory   materials now under preparation by the Environmental Protection Agency.<\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a name=\"toc\"><\/p>\n<h2>TABLE OF CONTENTS<\/h2>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#1\"> I. PREVENTION APPROACHES<\/a><\/h3>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#1A\">SOURCE WATER PROTECTION<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS, PROGRAM ELEMENTS, TIME FRAME FOR   ASSESSMENTS, USE OF OTHER AUTHORITIES, ASSESSMENT LINK TO   ALTERNATIVE MONITORING, DWSRF FUNDS  OR ASSESSMENTS,   DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, PETITION PROGRAM, CONTAMINANTS ADDRESSED   BY PETITIONS, RESPONSE TO PETITIONS, USE OF CLEAN WATER ACT FUNDS,   GRANTS FOR STATE PROGRAMS, WELLHEAD PROTECTION, NEW YORK CITY   WATERSHED<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#1B\">STATE GROUND WATER PROTECTION<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>GROUND WATER GRANTS FOR STATES, GROUND WATER GRANT GUIDANCE,   REPORT TO CONGRESS<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#1C\">CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>NEW SYSTEM AUTHORITY, SYSTEMS IN SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANCE, STATE   CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES, CONTENT OF STATE STRATEGY, EPA   INFORMATION, EFFECT OF REGULATIONS ON CAPACITY, REPORT ON STATE   PROGRESS, LINK TO SRF ASSISTANCE, FINANCE CENTERS, TECHNOLOGY   ASSISTANCE CENTERS<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#1D\">OPERATOR CERTIFICATION<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>CERTIFICATION PARTNERSHIP, CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES, STATE PROGRAMS,   TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT<\/p>\n<h3>II. CONSUMER INFORMATION<\/h3>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#2A\">CONSUMER AWARENESS<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORTS, COVERAGE, EPA REGULATIONS, HOTLINE,   BOTTLED WATER CONSUMER STUDY<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#2B\">PUBLIC NOTIFICATION<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, VIOLATIONS WITH SERIOUS EFFECTS, OTHER   VIOLATIONS, STATE REPORTS, EPA REPORTS<\/p>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#3\">III. REGULATORY PROGRAM<\/a><\/h3>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#3A\">CONTAMINANT SELECTION<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>GENERAL AUTHORITY, GOOD SCIENCE, OCCURRENCE DATABASE,   CONTAMINANT LIST, DETERMINATION OF WHETHER TO REGULATE, URGENT   THREATS<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#3B\">STANDARDS AND REGULATION DEVELOPMENT<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>RISK COMMUNICATION, COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS, SETTING MCLs, STANDARD   SETTING FLEXIBILITY, LIMITATION ON FLEXIBILITY, RISK-RISK   CONSIDERATIONS, JUDICIAL REVIEW, REVIEW OF STANDARDS, GROUND WATER   DISINFECTION, EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS, FILTER BACKWASH,   REGULATION DEVELOPMENT FUNDING, BOTTLED WATER STANDARDS<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#3C\">ARSENIC, SULFATE, RADON, DISINFECTION   BYPRODUCTS<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>ARSENIC STUDY PLAN, ARSENIC DEADLINES, SULFATE STUDY AND   REGULATION, RADON STUDY BY NAS, RADON STANDARD, ALTERNATIVE RADON   STANDARD, STATE MULTIMEDIA RADON PROGRAMS, REVIEW OF MULTIMEDIA   RADON PROGRAMS, SCHEDULE FOR MICROBIAL\/DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS,   DBP STANDARD-SETTING AND RISK-RISK, DBP STANDARD-SETTING<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#3D\">DRINKING WATER STUDIES AND RESEARCH<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS, MICROBIAL\/DBP STUDIES, WATERBORNE DISEASE   STUDIES ANDINFORMATION, SENSITIVE SUBPOPULATIONS, SCREENING FOR   ESTROGENIC  SUBSTANCES, RESEARCH FUNDS, STRATEGIC PLAN, KERR LAB<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#3E\">SMALL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VARIANCES, AND   EXEMPTIONS<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>AFFORDABLE TECHNOLOGIES, SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE, VARIANCE   TECHNOLOGY, SMALL SYSTEM VARIANCES, REGULATIONS FOR VARIANCES,   BLOCK ON CERTAIN VARIANCES, VARIANCE TIME FRAMES, AFFORDABILITY   CRITERIA, CHANGE TO EXISTING VARIANCE PROCESS, REVIEW OF VARIANCES,   TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION, EXEMPTIONS<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#3F\">MONITORING<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>INFORMATION COLLECTION, REVIEW OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTS, INTERIM   MONITORING RELIEF, PERMANENT ALTERNATIVE MONITORING, EPA GUIDANCE,   UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING, SMALL AND MEDIUM SYSTEM   MONITORING PLAN, RESULTS REPORTING, AUTHORIZATION, ANALYTICAL   METHODS<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#3G\">ENFORCEMENT<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS, PENALTY CAP, PENALTY PROCESS, CONSOLIDATION   INCENTIVE, ENFORCEABLE REQUIREMENTS, NOTIFICATION OF LOCAL   OFFICIALS, EMERGENCY AUTHORITY PENALTY<\/p>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#4\">IV. FUNDING FOR STATES AND WATER   SYSTEMS<\/a><\/h3>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#4A\">DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>ESTABLISHMENT, ALLOTMENT AND ELIGIBILITY, LINK TO PRIMACY, LINK TO   CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT, LINK TO OPERATOR CERTIFICATION, USE OF FUNDS,   INTENDED USE PLANS, STATE MATCH, SET-ASIDES, OTHER USES   OF FUNDS, COMBINED FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, TRANSFER OF FUNDS,   REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE, AUDITS, NEEDS SURVEY, WATER   CONSERVATION<\/p>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#5\">V. OTHER PROVISIONS<\/a><\/h3>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#5A\">PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SUPERVISION<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>TIME FRAME FOR STATE PRIMACY, ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY   REQUIREMENT FOR PRIMACY, INTERIM PRIMACY, PUBLIC WATER   SYSTEM SUPERVISION GRANTS, EPA PRIMACY<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#5B\">FEDERAL AGENCIES<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY, REVIEW OF ORDERS, CITIZEN ACTION<\/p>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#5C\">MISCELLANEOUS<\/a><\/h3>\n<p>LEAD LEACHING STANDARD, LEAD PROHIBITION, LIMITED   ALTERNATIVE TO FILTRATION, GRANTS FOR ALASKA NATIVE   VILLAGES, RELATIONSHIP OF GRANTS TO DWSRF, WASHINGTON   AQUEDUCT, DRINKING WATER FUNDS FOR COLONIAS,   WASTEWATER FUNDS FOR COLONIAS, ZEBRA MUSSEL CONTROL,   DEFINITIONAL CHANGE FOR ANALYTIC METHODS, DEFINITION OF   COMMUNITY\/NONCOMMUNITY SYSTEM, OPEN CONVEYANCES,   RETURN FLOWS<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html#5D\">ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR WATER, INFRASTRUCTURE   AND WATERSHEDS (Title IV&#8211;does not amend SDWA)<\/a><\/h4>\n<p>GRANT AUTHORITY, USE OF GRANTS, FUNDING LEVELS<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a name=\"1\"><\/p>\n<h2>I. PREVENTION APPROACHES<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"1A\"><\/p>\n<h3>SOURCE WATER PROTECTION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS: Establishes a new Section 1453 for source water quality   assessments.  States with PWSS primacy shall submit source water assessment programs to EPA   for approval.  EPA is required to publish guidance to States by August 6, 1997.  States must   submit their program to EPA no later than 18 months after EPA publishes guidance.   A State   program is automatically approved 9 months after submittal to EPA unless EPA disapproves   program. [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>PROGRAM ELEMENTS: A State assessment program is required to: (1) delineate the   boundaries of the areas providing source waters for public water systems, and (2) identify (to the   extent practicable) the origins of regulated and certain unregulated contaminants in the delineated   area to determine the susceptibility of public water systems to such contaminants. [1453] Sec.   132(a)<\/p>\n<p>TIME FRAME FOR ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are to be completed for all public water   systems within 2 years after EPA approval of the State&#8217;s program.  EPA may extend this period   up to 18 months taking into account funds made available to the State under the Drinking Water   State Revolving Fund (DWSRF).  States shall make the results of the source water assessments   available to the public.  [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>USE OF OTHER AUTHORITIES: To avoid duplication, assessments may make use of sanitary   surveys, State wellhead protection programs, pesticide State management plans, State watershed   initiatives including efforts under the Surface Water Treatment Rule, and efforts under the Federal   Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act). [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>ASSESSMENT LINK TO ALTERNATIVE MONITORING: For a State to tailor alternative  \t\tmonitoring requirements for public water systems under a new permanent  \t\tmonitoring relief authority (Section 1418), a State must have an EPA approved  \t\tsource water assessment program. Any public water system seeking alternative  \t\tmonitoring requirements under a State&#8217;s permanent monitoring relief authority  \t\tmust have a complete source water assessment. [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>DWSRF FUNDS FOR SOURCE WATER PROTECTION: A State may use up to 10% of its   DWSRF allotment in both FY 1996 and 1997 to delineate and assess source water protection   areas.  Loans may also be used to acquire land or conservation easements to protect source   waters and to implement voluntary measures to facilitate compliance.  A State may use up to an   additional 10% of its DWSRF allotment to administer or provide technical assistance through   source water protection programs. [1452(g), (k)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: EPA is to conduct a demonstration project of the most effective   and protective means of assessing and protecting source waters serving large metropolitan areas   and located on Federal lands.  [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>PETITION PROGRAM: A new authority is established for a source water petition program.    States may establish a program to receive, approve and respond to petitions from a public water   system operator\/ owner or local government entity to assist in the development of voluntary local   incentive-based partnerships to (1) reduce the presence of contaminants, (2) provide financial or   technical assistance requested, and (3) develop recommendations for voluntary, long-term source   water protection strategies. [1454] Sec. 133(a)<\/p>\n<p>CONTAMINANTS ADDRESSED BY PETITIONS: Petitions may address only either   pathogenic organisms which are regulated (or for which regulation is required) or contaminants   detected that are not found &#8220;reliably and consistently&#8221; below the MCL. [1454] Sec. 133(a)<\/p>\n<p>RESPONSE TO PETITIONS: In responding to source water petitions, a State is to provide, at a   minimum, information on: priority of the public health concern identified by the petition; funds   available;  and technical\/financial assistance available from other Federal and State programs,   including the DWSRF and programmatic grants of the CWA, Section 6217 of the Coastal Zone   Act, Title XI of the Food Security Act, sole source aquifer, wellhead protection, pesticide-ground   water management plans, etc. [1454]  Sec. 133(a)<\/p>\n<p>USE OF CLEAN WATER ACT FUNDS: A &#8220;Sense of Congress&#8221; provision states that priorities   established under section 606(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act give special   consideration to projects recommended pursuant to local source water petitions. [Free standing&#8211;   does not amend SDWA]  Sec.133(b)<\/p>\n<p>GRANTS FOR STATE PROGRAMS: By August 7, 1997, EPA is to publish guidance to assist   States in developing source water quality protection partnership programs, and to assist local   governments and community water systems in developing partnerships and assessing source water   quality.  State grants of $5 million are authorized to carry out such programs. [1454(c)] Sec.   133(a)  Also, up to 10% of a State&#8217;s DWSRF allotment can be used by States for responding to   petitions. [1452(g), (k)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>WELLHEAD PROTECTION: Annual funding for States wellhead protection programs is   reauthorized for FYs 1997-2003 at $30 million, underground injection control programs at $15   million, and critical aquifer protection at $15 million. [1428(k)] Sec. 120.  States may use up to   10% of their DWSRF allotment to implement their wellhead protection programs. [1452(g)]  Sec.   130<\/p>\n<p>NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED: Establishes the New York City watershed protection   program.  EPA is authorized to provide financial assistance to State of New York for   demonstration projects implemented as part of the watershed program for the protection and   enhancement of the quality of source waters of the New York City water supply system.  Within 5   years, the Governor of New York is to provide EPA with a report on the results of funded   projects.  $15 million grant to New York is authorized for each fiscal year 1997 to 2003.   [1443(d)] Sec. 128<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"1B\"><\/p>\n<h3>STATE GROUND WATER PROTECTION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>GROUND WATER GRANTS FOR STATES: Establishes a new Section 1429 for state ground   water protection programs.  EPA may make grants to States to develop programs to ensure   coordinated and comprehensive protection of ground water resources within the State.  $15   million is authorized for State grants for each fiscal year 1997 to 2003. [1429] Sec. 131<\/p>\n<p>GROUND WATER GRANT GUIDANCE: By August 6, 1997, and annually thereafter, EPA is   to publish guidance establishing procedures for State grant applications. [1429] Sec. 131<\/p>\n<p>REPORT TO CONGRESS: By August, 1999, and every three years thereafter, EPA is to report   to Congress on the quality of the Nation&#8217;s ground waters and effectiveness of State programs for   ground water protection. [1429] Sec. 131<br \/>\n<a name=\"1C\"><\/p>\n<h3>CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>NEW SYSTEM AUTHORITY: By October 1, 1999, each State must obtain the authority to   ensure that new community water systems and non-transient noncommunity water systems have   the technical, financial, and managerial capacity to meet National Primary Drinking Water   Regulations.  A State will receive only 80% of its DWSRF allotment unless the State has such   authority.  [1420(a)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>SYSTEMS IN SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANCE: States must prepare and submit to EPA by   August 6, 1997 (and periodically update) a list of community water systems and non-transient,   non-community water systems that have a history of significant noncompliance, and the reasons   for their noncompliance.  States must report to EPA in 5 years on the success of efforts to assist   small systems in improving capacity. [1420(b)] Sec.119<\/p>\n<p>STATE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES: States are required to establish capacity   development strategies to assist systems in developing and maintaining technical, financial and   management capacity.  States not developing and implementing a strategy receive only 90% of   their DWSRF allotment in Fiscal Year 2001; 85% in 2002; and 80% in each subsequent fiscal   year. [1420(c)] Sec. 119.  The total withholding for all capacity development provisions may not   exceed 20%.  [1452(a)(1)(G)].  Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>CONTENT OF STATE STRATEGY: In preparing its capacity development strategy, each State   shall:  consider the criteria it will use to identify public water supplies most in need of improved   capacity; describe factors that encourage or impair capacity development;  describe how the State   will use its authorities to assist systems in complying, encourage partnerships between systems,   and assist in training\/certification of operators; describe how the State will measure progress; and   identify parties interested in capacity development [1420(c)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>EPA INFORMATION: Within 180 days of enactment, EPA is to conduct a review of existing   State capacity development efforts and publish information to assist States and water systems in   capacity development efforts.   Within 2 years of enactment EPA is to develop guidance, in   consultation with the States, describing legal authorities and other means to ensure that new   systems demonstrate technical, financial, and managerial capacity. [1420(d)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>EFFECT OF REGULATIONS ON CAPACITY: When promulgating new regulations, EPA must   include an analysis of the likely effect of regulations on the technical, financial, and managerial   capacity of water systems. [1420(d)(3)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>REPORT ON STATE PROGRESS: States must make available to the public a report to the   Governor (within 2 years and every 3 years thereafter) on the efficacy of their capacity   development strategy and progress in improving water system capacity. [1420(c)(3)]  Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>LINK TO DWSRF ASSISTANCE: Systems that are in significant noncompliance or lack   technical, financial and managerial capacity to ensure compliance may not receive DWSRF   assistance unless the assistance will ensure compliance and, where the system lacks capacity, the   system agrees to undertake appropriate changes, as the State deems necessary, to ensure capacity.   [1452(a)(3)]  Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>FINANCE CENTERS: EPA is authorized to provide initial funding for one or more   university-based environmental finance centers (including a national public water system capacity   development clearinghouse) that would provide technical assistance to State and local officials in   developing the financial and managerial capacity of public water systems.  $1,500,000 is   authorized for each fiscal year 1997-2003.  [1420(g)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>TECHNOLOGY ASSISTANCE CENTERS: EPA is authorized to make grants to universities to   establish and operate small public water system technology assistance centers.  The centers would   conduct training and technical assistance relating to the information, performance, and technical   needs of small water systems.  Criteria are provided for EPA to use to select grant recipients.  $2   million is authorized for each of the fiscal years 1997 through 1999 and $5 million for each of the   fiscal years 2000 through 2003. [1420(f)] Sec. 119<br \/>\n<a name=\"1D\"><\/p>\n<h3>OPERATOR CERTIFICATION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>CERTIFICATION PARTNERSHIP: Within 180 days EPA must initiate a partnership with   States, Public Water Systems, and the public to develop information on recommended operator   certification requirements.   The information developed through this partnership must be published   within 18 months of enactment. [1420(d)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES: Within 30 months of enactment, in cooperation with the   States, EPA must publish guidelines specifying minimum standards for certification and   recertification of operators of community and nontransient, noncommunity water systems.   [1419(a)]  Existing State programs are to be considered substantially equivalent to the guidelines   unless the existing program fails to achieve the overall public health objectives of the guidelines.   [1419(c)] Sec. 123<\/p>\n<p>STATE PROGRAMS: Beginning 2 years after guidelines are published, 20% of a State&#8217;s DWSRF   allotment will be withheld if the State is not implementing an operator certification program.   [1419(b)] Sec. 123<\/p>\n<p>TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT: EPA, through grants to the States (allocated on the basis of   &#8220;reasonable costs&#8221;), is required to reimburse training and certification costs for operators of   systems serving fewer than 3,300, including per diem for unsalaried operators, who are required   to undergo training as a result of the Federal requirement.  Grants of $30 million are authorized,   and DWSRF funds may used if appropriations are not sufficient. [1419(d)] Sec. 123<br \/>\n<a name=\"2\"><\/p>\n<h2>II. CONSUMER INFORMATION<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"2A\"><\/p>\n<h3>CONSUMER AWARENESS<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORTS: Community water systems are to prepare an annual   &#8220;consumer confidence   report&#8221; on the source of their drinking water and the levels of contaminants found in the drinking   water.  The report is to   be sent to all customers by mail.  The report is required annually, and must include: (1)   information on the source of   drinking water, (2) brief definitions of terms, (3) (if regulated contaminants are found) the MCLG,   MCL, and the level   found, (4) (if MCL is violated) information on health effects, and (5) information on levels of   unregulated contaminants (if   required by EPA regulations).  [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>COVERAGE: Governors may allow systems serving fewer than 10,000 persons to publish the   report in a local news-   paper, in lieu of mailing.   Governors may also allow systems serving fewer than 500 people to   notify customers that the   report is available, in lieu of mailing.  The report is required annually.  States may adopt   alternative requirements for   the form and content of consumer confidence reports (through State regulation). [1414(c)(4)]   Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>EPA REGULATIONS: EPA must issue regulations within 2 years of enactment, that establish the   requirements for the   consumer confidence reports.  These regulations must be developed in consultation with public   water systems,   environmental groups, public interest groups,  risk communication experts, and the States.  The   regulations must   include plainly worded definitions of &#8220;maximum contaminant level goal,&#8221; &#8220;maximum contaminant   level,&#8221; &#8220;variances,&#8221;   and &#8220;exemptions,&#8221; as well as plain-language explanations of the health concerns associated with   contaminants.   [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>HOTLINE: EPA is required to have a Hotline for consumers to provide more information on   drinking water contaminants   and potential health effects. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>BOTTLED WATER CONSUMER STUDY: The Food and Drug Administration is required to   publish in 18 months for   public comment, a study on the feasibility of appropriate methods for informing consumers of the   contents of bottled   water.  The final study is to be done in 30 months. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(b)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"2B\"><\/p>\n<h3>PUBLIC NOTIFICATION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Clarifies general requirements for public notification of   violations of any MCL, treatment   technique, testing procedure, or monitoring requirement, and the existence  or violation of a   variance or exemption.    The general requirement includes unregulated contaminants if (as in the old law) notice is required   by EPA regulations.    The basis for EPA&#8217;s public notification regulation is altered to clarify those violations requiring 24   hour notice and those   that may be provided at a later date.  States are allowed to adopt alternative &#8220;form and content&#8221;   of public notice   through State regulation. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>VIOLATIONS WITH SERIOUS EFFECTS: Notices for violations with potential to have   &#8220;serious adverse effect&#8221; must   contain an explanation of the violation, the potential health effects, what the system is doing to   correct the problem, and   whether consumers need to use an alternate source of water.  Recipients of such notices must   include consumers and   the State.  Notices must be given by &#8220;appropriate&#8221; broadcast media and newspaper serving area,   or posted door-to-door in lieu of broadcast media\/newspaper.  Notices must be given within 24   hours after occurrence of violation.   [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>OTHER VIOLATIONS: EPA is to prescribe the form and manner of the notice for violations that   do not have the potential   to have a &#8220;serious adverse effect.&#8221;  Persons served by a system must receive the notice in the first   bill after the violation,   in an annual report, or by mail or direct delivery within a year. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>STATE REPORTS: Each State is required to prepare an annual report on violations.  States are   also required to publish   and distribute summaries of the report and specify where the full report is available.  The first   report is due on January   1, 1998. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>EPA REPORTS: EPA is required to prepare an annual report summarizing States&#8217; reports and   public notices submitted   by Indian Tribes.  The report will include EPA recommendations on resources needed to improve   compliance and will   discuss EPA enforcement activity against, and financial assistance to, Indian reservations.  EPA&#8217;s   first report is due in   July, 1998.  [1414(c)]  Sec. 114(a)<br \/>\n<a name=\"3\"><\/p>\n<h2>III.  REGULATORY PROGRAM<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"3A\"><\/p>\n<h3>CONTAMINANT SELECTION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>GENERAL AUTHORITY: EPA&#8217;s general authority to set an MCLG and to regulate a   contaminant is modified to apply to   contaminants that:  may adversely effect human health; are known or likely to occur at a   frequency and level of public   health concern in public water systems; and for which regulation presents a meaning-ful   opportunity for health risk   reduction for persons served by public water systems.  [Section 1412(b)] Sec. 102(a)<\/p>\n<p>GOOD SCIENCE:  Continues the old law&#8217;s requirement that EPA consult with the EPA&#8217;s Science   Advisory Board and   National Drinking Water Advisory Council in promulgating regulations.  A provision is added   requiring EPA to use the   &#8220;best available, peer-reviewed science&#8221; and data collected by accepted or best available methods   in carrying out   science-related actions under Section 1412 (&#8220;National Drinking Water Regulations&#8221;).  [1412(b)]   Sec.103<\/p>\n<p>OCCURRENCE DATABASE: EPA must establish an occurrence database within 3 years of   enactment.  In establishing   the database, EPA must solicit recommendations from the Science Advisory Board, States, and   other interested parties.     The database is to include information on unregulated contaminants for which monitoring is   required by EPA, and   regulated contaminants detected at quantifiable levels (whether or not the level constitutes a   violation of a standard).     The information in the database must be made available to the public in a readily accessible form.   [1445(g)] Sec. 126<\/p>\n<p>CONTAMINANT LIST: Within 18 months of  enactment and every 5 years thereafter, EPA will   publish a list of   contaminants not subject to any proposed or final national primary drinking water regulation and   which are known or   anticipated to occur in public water systems and may require regulation.  In developing the list,   EPA must consult with   the scientific community, allow for public comment, and consider the occurrence database   (established under Section   1445).  [1412(b)] Sec. 102(a)<\/p>\n<p>DETERMINATION OF WHETHER TO REGULATE: The requirement that EPA regulate 25   additional contaminants every 3   years is eliminated.  Instead, starting five years from the date of enactment and every 5 years   thereafter, EPA is   required to determine whether or not to regulate at  least 5 of the contaminants listed as potential   contaminants for   regulation (see &#8220;contaminant list&#8221; above).  EPA is directed to make determinations for   contaminants that present the   greatest public health concern.  In selecting such contaminants, EPA must take into consideration   the effect of   contaminants upon sensitive subpopulations, such as infants, children, pregnant women, the   elderly, and individuals   with a history of serious illness.  Within 2 years after a determination to regulate a contaminant,   EPA must propose a   maximum contaminant level goal and national primary drinking water regulation.  EPA must   publish an MCLG and   final national primary drinking water regulation 18 months thereafter.  [1412(b)] Sec. 102(b)   (related to &#8220;25 every 3   years&#8221;) and Sec. 104(a) (related to &#8220;determination&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>URGENT THREATS: EPA (after consultation with the Department of Health and Human   Services) may issue interim   regulations for any contaminant which poses an urgent threat to human health without making the   usual   &#8220;determination to regulate&#8221; (see above)  and completing the cost-benefit analysis (see &#8220;standards   and regulation   development&#8221; below).  However a cost-benefit analysis and the required determination (to   regulate or not) must be   done within 3 years after the interim rule, and the rule must be repromulgated or  revised if   necessary.  [1412(b)] Sec.   102(a)<br \/>\n<a name=\"3B\"><\/p>\n<h3>STANDARDS AND REGULATION   DEVELOPMENT<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>RISK COMMUNICATION: In support of each regulation, EPA must make available to the   public a document that   specifies, to the extent practicable, the population addressed by the regulation; the central, upper   and lower estimates   of risk; significant uncertainties and studies that would help resolve uncertainties; and   peer-reviewed studies that   support or fail to support estimates.  [1412(b)] Sec. 103<\/p>\n<p>COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Whenever EPA proposes a national primary drinking water   regulation, EPA must publish a   cost-benefit analysis.  The analysis for alternative MCLs must include, among other things,   consideration of effects on   sensitive subpopulations.   The analysis for treatment technique regulations must take into account   &#8220;as appropriate&#8221;   the cost and benefit factors required for an MCL regulation.  EPA may identify health benefit   measurement and valua-   tion methods, including consumer &#8220;willingness to pay&#8221; for reductions in health risks. [1412(b)]   Sec. 103<\/p>\n<p>SETTING MCLs: The new law retains the old requirement that MCLs be set as close to MCLGs   &#8220;as is feasible,&#8221; except   when EPA determines that the cost of a standard at that level are not justified by the benefits, or   when certain &#8220;risk-risk&#8221;   considerations apply.  [1412(b)] Sec. 104<\/p>\n<p>STANDARD SETTING FLEXIBILITY: When EPA proposes an MCL, EPA must publish a   determination as to whether the   costs of the standard are justified by the benefits.  If EPA determines that the costs of an MCL are   not justified by the   benefits, the law allows EPA to set an MCL that maximizes health risk reduction benefits at a cost   that is justified by the   benefits.  [1412(b)(6)] Sec. 104<\/p>\n<p>LIMITATION ON FLEXIBILITY: EPA cannot use the authority to adjust the MCL from the   feasible level if the benefits are   justified (at the feasible level) for systems that serve 10,000 or more persons and for systems that   are unlikely to receive   a variance.  [1412(b)(6)] Sec. 104<\/p>\n<p>RISK-RISK CONSIDERATIONS: EPA may consider &#8220;risk-risk&#8221; tradeoffs when setting an MCL.    An MCL may be set at a   level other than the feasible level if the technology to meet the MCL would increase health risk by   (i) increasing   concentration of other contaminants in drinking water, or (ii) interfering with treatment used to   comply with other   primary drinking water regulations.  When establishing such an MCL, EPA shall (i) minimize   overall risk by balancing   both the risk reductions from treating the individual contaminant with possible side-effects of such   treatment on   concentrations of other contaminants, and (ii) assure that the combination of treatments for the   individual contaminant   and other contaminants shall not be more stringent than the &#8220;feasible&#8221; standard.  [1412(b)(5)] Sec.   104<\/p>\n<p>JUDICIAL REVIEW: EPA&#8217;s determination of whether an MCL&#8217;s benefits justify the cost is   judicially reviewable only as part   of a Court&#8217;s review of the associated primary drinking water regulation. [1412(b)(6)] Sec. 104<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF STANDARDS: The requirement for EPA to review every regulation is changed   from 3 years to 6 years.  EPA   shall revise national primary drinking water standards, as appropriate.  Any revisions must be in   accordance with the   new provisions of section 1412, except that each revision &#8220;shall maintain, or provide for greater,   protection of the health   of persons.&#8221;  [1412(b)(9)] Sec. 104(c)<\/p>\n<p>GROUND WATER DISINFECTION: EPA shall issue regulations requiring disinfection &#8220;as   necessary&#8221; for ground water   systems.  These regulations shall be issued at any time after August 1999 and no later than the   final disinfection   byproducts Stage II rule.  After consultation with the States, EPA shall promulgate criteria for   determining whether   disinfection shall be required as a treatment technique for groundwater systems.  [1412(b)(8)]   Sec. 107<\/p>\n<p>EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS: National primary drinking water regulations shall take   effect 3 years from date of   promulgation unless EPA determines an earlier date is &#8220;practicable.&#8221;  An additional 2 years for   compliance may be   provided if necessary for capital improvements.  [1412(b)(10)] Sec. 108<\/p>\n<p>FILTER BACKWASH: Not later than August 2000, EPA shall promulgate a regulation for filter   backwash recycling within   the treatment process of public water supply systems, unless such recycling has been addressed in   the Enhanced   Surface Water Treatment Rule prior to that date.  [1412(b)(14)] Sec. 110<\/p>\n<p>REGULATION DEVELOPMENT FUNDING: $35 million is authorized for conducting studies,   assessments, and analyses   in support of regulations or the development of methods for fiscal years 1996-2003.   [1412(b)(3)(C)] Sec. 103<\/p>\n<p>BOTTLED WATER STANDARDS: FDA is required to regulate the same contaminants in   bottled water that EPA regulates   in public water supplies, unless the FDA makes a finding that such a regulation is not necessary to   protect public   health.  The standard of quality regulation for bottled water shall be &#8220;no less stringent&#8221; than the   MCL established by a   national primary drinking water regulation, and the regulations must include appropriate   monitoring requirements.   [Section 410 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act] Sec. 305<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"3C\"><\/p>\n<h3>ARSENIC, SULFATE, RADON, DISINFECTION   BYPRODUCTS<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>ARSENIC STUDY PLAN: 180 days after enactment, EPA must develop an arsenic study plan to   assess health risks   associated with exposure to low levels of arsenic.  In conducting this study, EPA must consult   with, and may enter into a   cooperative agreement with, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), other Federal agencies,   and interested   stakeholders.  [1412(b)(12)(A)] Sec. 109(a)<\/p>\n<p>ARSENIC DEADLINES: EPA must propose an arsenic national primary drinking water   regulation by January 1, 2000 and    issue a final regulation by January 1, 2001.  [1412(b)(12)(A)] Sec. 109(a)<\/p>\n<p>SULFATE STUDY AND REGULATION: Prior to regulating sulfate, EPA and CDC must   conduct a study of the dose   response relationship for adverse human health effects from sulfate in drinking water, including   effects on populations   at greater risk.  The study shall be completed not later than 30 months after the date of enactment.    Sulfate must be   among the 5 contaminants considered for regulation in the first 5 year cycle.  If sulfate is   regulated, &#8220;notification&#8221; and   &#8220;alternative&#8221; water must be included as means of compliance.  [1412(b)(12)(B)] Sec. 109(a)<\/p>\n<p>RADON STUDY BY NAS: EPA will arrange for the NAS to prepare a risk assessment for radon   and an assessment of   risk reduction benefits from various mitigation measures.  [1412(b)(13)] Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>RADON STANDARD: Within 30 months of enactment, EPA will publish a health risk reduction   and cost analysis   associated with possible maximum contaminant levels.  Within 3 years after enactment, EPA is to   propose a maximum   contaminant level goal and drinking water regulation for radon.  The final rule must be   promulgated 1 year thereafter.   [1412(b)(13)] Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>ALTERNATIVE RADON STANDARD: EPA is required to also establish an &#8220;alternative MCL&#8221;   for radon if the MCL is set a   level that is &#8220;more stringent than necessary to reduce the contribution to radon in indoor air from   drinking water to a   concentration that is equivalent to the national average concentration of radon in outdoor air.&#8221;    The level of the   alternative MCL is linked to average outdoor radon levels.  If an alternative MCL is established,   then EPA must publish   guidelines for States to develop multimedia radon programs. [1412(b)(13)] Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>STATE MULTIMEDIA RADON PROGRAMS: Water systems may comply with the alternative   MCL in a State that submits   a multimedia radon program that is approved by EPA.   EPA approval is required if a State&#8217;s   program is expected to   achieve risk reduction benefits that are equal or greater than the benefits that would be achieved   by implementing the   (regular) MCL.  EPA&#8217;s approval or disapproval is required within 180 day of receipt of the State   submittal.  The   compliance date of the radon regulation is extended for 18 months in a State if the Governor of a   State submits a letter   to EPA (within 90 days after the regulation is promulgated) committing to develop a multimedia   program.  [1412(b)(13)]  Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF MULTIMEDIA RADON PROGRAMS: EPA is to review State multimedia   programs every 5 years, and may   withdraw approval of programs that do not meet the approval requirements (achieving equal or   greater risk reduction).    Individual public water systems may also submit mitigation programs where a State fails to submit   a program or where   the State program is disapproved.  [1412(b)(13)]  Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>SCHEDULE FOR MICROBIAL\/ DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS: EPA will promulgate an   Interim Enhanced Surface   Water Treatment rule, a Final Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, a Stage I Disinfectants   and Disinfection Bypro-   ducts Rule, and a Stage II Disinfection Byproducts Rule in accordance with a February 10, 1994   Federal Register   notice.  If schedule delays occur, all subsequent rules must be completed no later than a revised   date reflecting the   intervals for the rule.  [1412(b)(8)]  Sec. 102<\/p>\n<p>DBP STANDARD-SETTING AND RISK-RISK: EPA may use &#8220;risk-risk&#8221; considerations in   setting DBP Stage I and II   standards.  The considerations used in proposing the DBP rule in 1994 (developed through a   regulatory negotiation)   &#8220;shall be treated as consistent&#8221; with the risk-risk authority for the purpose of finalizing the DBP   regulations. [Free   standing provision &#8212; does not amend SDWA.] Sec. 104(b)<\/p>\n<p>DBP STANDARD-SETTING: EPA may not use the standard setting flexibility (1412(b)(6)(A)0   to establish an MCL in Stage   I and Stage II of the DBP rule, or for Cryptosporidium.  EPA may use such authority to establish   ground water   disinfection regulations. [1412(b)(6)(C)]  Sec. 104(a)(b)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"3D\"><\/p>\n<h3>DRINKING WATER STUDIES AND   RESEARCH<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS: EPA must conduct studies to understand the mechanisms by   which chemicals cause   adverse effects and on new approaches for studying the adverse effects of contaminant mixtures in   drinking water.    [1458(b)] Sec. 137<\/p>\n<p>MICROBIAL\/DBP STUDIES: Within 180 days of enactment EPA, after consultation with HHS   and USDA, must conduct   studies to support the development of the DBP\/microbial pathogen rules.  The authorization to   conduct the studies is   $12.5 million annually for 1997- 2003.  The studies must include: toxicological and, if warranted,   epidemiological studies   to determine the adverse effects from disinfectants and disinfectant by-products; and the   development of   dose-response curves for Cryptosporidium and Norwalk virus.  [1458(c)] Sec. 137<\/p>\n<p>WATERBORNE DISEASE STUDIES AND INFORMATION: Within 2 years of enactment,   EPA and CDC must conduct pilot   waterborne disease occurrence studies for at least 5 major U.S. communities or public water   systems and within 5   years of enactment must prepare a report on the findings and provide a national estimate of   waterborne disease   occurrence.  EPA and CDC must establish a national training and public education campaign to   educate professional   health care providers and the general public about waterborne disease and the symptoms that may   be caused by   infectious agents, including microbial contaminants. The authorization for these activities is $3   million\/year for 1997   through 2001.  [1458(d)] Sec. 137<\/p>\n<p>SENSITIVE SUBPOPULATIONS: Within 4 years of enactment, and periodically as new data   becomes available, EPA   must conduct studies to identify subpopulations at greater risk (e.g., infants, children, pregnant   women) than the   general public of adverse health effects from exposure to contaminants in drinking water,   and   report to Congress on   the results of studies.  [1458(a)] Sec. 137<\/p>\n<p>SCREENING FOR ESTROGENIC SUBSTANCES: EPA may conduct testing under Section   408(p) of the Food, Drug and   Cosmetic Act screening program for substances that may be found in sources of drinking water in   which a substantial   population may be exposed.  [1457] Sec. 136<\/p>\n<p>RESEARCH FUNDS: Funds &#8220;as may be necessary&#8221; are authorized for research, not to exceed   $26.593 million, for   drinking water research for fiscal years 1997-2003.  Title II&#8211;Sec. 201<\/p>\n<p>STRATEGIC PLAN: EPA must develop a strategic plan for drinking water research and transmit   this plan to Congress   and the public for review (no deadlines included for completing the plan).   Title II&#8211;Sec. 202]<\/p>\n<p>KERR LAB: EPA is allowed to re-establish a partnership between the Kerr Environmental   Research Lab and the   National Center for Ground Water Research to conduct research, training, and technology   transfer for ground water   quality (no funds are authorized for this activity).  Title II&#8211;Sec. 203<br \/>\n<a name=\"3E\"><\/p>\n<h3>SMALL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VARIANCES, AND   EXEMPTIONS<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>AFFORDABLE TECHNOLOGIES: When promulgating new national primary drinking water   regulations, EPA is to   identify technologies that are affordable and which achieve compliance for categories of systems   serving fewer than   10,000.  Technologies may include packaged or modular systems and point-of-use (POU)\/   point-of-entry (POE) units   under the control of the water system (no POU for microbial contaminants). [1412(b)(4)(E)] Sec.   105<\/p>\n<p>SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE (SWTR):   EPA must within 1 year list small system   technologies that meet the   SWTR.   Within 2 years, EPA (in consultation with the States) must list technologies that achieve   compliance with all    existing regulations. [1412(b)(4)(E)] Sec. 105<\/p>\n<p>VARIANCE TECHNOLOGY: Whenever an affordable technology cannot be identified that   meets an MCL, EPA is   required to identify &#8220;variance technologies&#8221; that are affordable, but do not necessarily meet the   MCL.  Such   technologies shall &#8220;achieve the maximum reduction or inactivation efficiency that is affordable   considering the size of   the system and the quality of the source water.&#8221;  EPA is to issue guidance on variance   technologies for existing   regulations within 2 years. [1412(b)(15)] Sec.111(a)<\/p>\n<p>SMALL SYSTEM VARIANCES: States are authorized to grant variances from standards for   systems serving up to 3,300   people if the system cannot afford to comply (through treatment, an alternative source, or   restructuring) and the system   installs the variance technology.  The terms of the variance must ensure adequate protection of   human health.  States   can grant variances to systems serving 3,300-10,000 people with EPA approval. [1415(e)] Sec.   116<\/p>\n<p>REGULATIONS FOR VARIANCES: Within 2 years, EPA, in consultation with the States, must   promulgate regulations for   variances.  Regulations must specify procedures to be used to grant or deny variances,   requirements for the installa-   tion and proper operation of variance technologies, eligibility criteria for a variance, and   information requirements for   variance applications. [1415(e)(7)] Sec. 116(a)<\/p>\n<p>BLOCK ON CERTAIN VARIANCES: Variances are not available for microbial contaminants or   for contaminants   regulated prior to 1986.  [1415(e)(6)] Sec. 116<\/p>\n<p>VARIANCE TIME FRAMES: A variance must require compliance with its conditions within 3   years of the date it is issued.    States may allow an additional 2 years when needed. [1415(e)(4)]  States must review variances   every 5 years following   the compliance date established in the variance.[1415(e)(5)] Sec. 116<\/p>\n<p>AFFORDABILITY CRITERIA: Within 18 months of enactment, EPA, in consultation with the   States and the Rural Utilities   Service of the Department of Agriculture, must publish information to assist States in developing   affordability criteria to   use in making variance determinations.  [1415(e)(7)(B)] Sec. 116<\/p>\n<p>CHANGE TO EXISTING VARIANCE PROCESS: The process for variances (retained from the   old law) is streamlined by   allowing a system to receive a variance &#8220;on the condition&#8221; that the system install the BAT, rather   than after the   installation of the technology, as previously required under SDWA.  (NOTE: This change applies   to ALL system sizes,   not just small systems.)  [1415(a)(1)(A)] Sec. 115<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF VARIANCES: EPA must review\/approve variances for systems serving   3,300-10,000 people.  EPA may   review and object to any proposed variance.  Consumers of water systems for which a State   proposes a variance may   petition EPA to object to a variance.  States must respond to EPA objections before granting a   variance.  [1415(e)(10)]   Sec. 116<\/p>\n<p>TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION: EPA may request information from manufacturers, States,   and other interested   persons on the effectiveness of commercially available treatment systems and technologies for the   purpose of   developing guidance or regulations related to small system technologies and variances. [1445(h)]   Sec. 111(b)<\/p>\n<p>EXEMPTIONS: In granting exemptions, a State may consider whether a community may be   defined as   &#8220;disadvantaged&#8221; for the purpose of receiving DWSRF funds, or whether DWSRF funds are   reasonably likely to be   received.  States must determine whether management or restructuring changes (or both) would   improve water quality   or achieve compliance before granting an exemption.  Schedules for compliance must include   &#8220;increments of   progress&#8221; (retained from old law) or &#8220;measures to develop an alternative source of water supply&#8221;   (new law).   A system   is not eligible for an exemption if the system receives a small system variance.  The period of an   exemption is   lengthened from 1 year (old law) to 3 years.  Eligibility for renewable exemptions  is expanded   from systems serving   fewer than 500 service connections (approximately 1500 persons) under the old law, to systems   serving fewer than   3,300 persons. Renewals are limited to a total of 6 years.  [1416] Sec. 117<br \/>\n<a name=\"3F\"><\/p>\n<h3>MONITORING<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>INFORMATION COLLECTION: Previous law is modified to clarify that EPA may collect   information from &#8220;every person   who is subject to any requirement of this title or who is a grantee.&#8221;  By regulation, EPA may   require information to assist   in developing standards, determining compliance, and evaluating health risk or advising the public   of risks.  EPA may   require information without rulemaking to determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether a person   has or is acting in   compliance.   EPA may also require information without rulemaking to assist in developing   standards, but EPA may not   require the installation of treatment, testing of technologies, or analysis of monitoring samples   unless EPA provides   funding. [1445(a)]  Sec. 125(a)<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Within two years after enactment, EPA is   required to review the monitor-ing requirements for at least 12 contaminants and promulgate any   necessary modifications.  [1445(a)] Sec. 125(a)<\/p>\n<p>INTERIM MONITORING RELIEF: A State may modify the monitoring requirements for public   water systems serving   10,000 or fewer persons for any regulated or unregulated contaminant (except for microbial   contaminants, disinfection   byproducts, or corrosion byproducts) so that no further quarterly monitoring be required if initial   monitoring fails to   detect the presence of the contaminant, and the State determines that the contaminant is unlikely   to be detected by   further monitoring.  This monitoring relief will end when permanent monitoring relief is adopted   or 36 months after   enactment. [1418]  Sec. 125(b)<\/p>\n<p>PERMANENT ALTERNATIVE MONITORING: A State exercising primary enforcement   authority for public water systems   may adopt permanent alternative monitoring requirements in accordance with EPA guidelines, if   the State has an   approved source water assessment program.  The States alternative monitoring program must be   adequate to assure   compliance with, and enforcement of, applicable drinking water regulations.  The alternative   requirements may not   apply to regulated microbial contaminants or indicators thereof (e.g., Giardia, coliform),   disinfectants or disinfection   by-products, or corrosion by-products. [1418] Sec. 125(b)<\/p>\n<p>EPA GUIDANCE: EPA must issue guidelines for alternative monitoring requirements at the same   time as guidelines for   source water assessments (under section 1453).  EPA may also approve  alternative monitoring   requirements for   systems in a State that does not have primacy.   [1418] Sec. 125(b)<\/p>\n<p>UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING: EPA must issue regulations establishing   criteria for the monitoring of   unregulated contaminants.  Monitoring shall vary based on system size, source water, and   contaminants likely to be   found.  Only a representative sample of systems serving 10,000 persons or fewer must monitor.    EPA shall list for   unregulated contaminant monitoring no more than 30 contaminants within 3 years after   enactment, and every 5 years   thereafter.  Results of the monitoring are to be included in the national contaminant occurrence   data base.  [1445(a)]   Sec. 125(c)<\/p>\n<p>SMALL AND MEDIUM SYSTEM MONITORING PLAN: Each State may develop an   unregulated contaminant monitoring   plan for small and medium systems (serving fewer than 10,000).  EPA is required to cover the   reasonable costs of   testing and laboratory analysis for such plans, using funds authorized for unregulated contaminant   monitoring (see   below), or a $2 million DWSRF reservation.   EPA shall waive the requirement for monitoring of   unregulated   contaminants in a State if the State demonstrates that the criteria for monitoring are not applicable   in the State.    [1445(a)] Sec. 125(c)<\/p>\n<p>RESULTS REPORTING: Water systems must provide the results of unregulated contaminant   monitoring to the primacy   agency (State\/EPA) and must notify persons served by the system of the availability of results.   [1445(a)]Sec. 125(c)<\/p>\n<p>AUTHORIZATION: Congress authorizes $10,000,000 per year for FYs 1997-2003 to carry out   provisions for unregulated   contaminant monitoring. [1445(a)] Sec. 125(c)<\/p>\n<p>ANALYTICAL METHODS: EPA is required to review new methods for screening regulated   contaminants, and may   approve them, if they are more accurate or more cost-effective than established methods approved   for use in   compliance monitoring. [1445(i)] Sec. 125(d)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"3G\"><\/p>\n<h3>ENFORCEMENT<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS: The process for issuing administrative compliance orders is   streamlined by deleting the   requirement for EPA to issue a proposed order. [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>PENALTY CAP: The maximum administrative penalty for violating an administrative order is   raised from $5,000 to   $25,000. [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>PENALTY PROCESS: The process for assessing an administrative penalty of $5,000 or less is   streamlined by deleting   the requirement for a hearing in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act for these   penalties.  Requires a   hearing in accordance with APA procedures if the penalty sought is between $5,000 and $25,000.   [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>CONSOLIDATION INCENTIVE: A public water supply may submit a plan (with specific   measures and schedules) for   approval by EPA or a primary enforcement State for consolidation (physical or managerial) or   transfer of owner- ship.     If the plan is approved, no enforcement action shall be taken with respect to the specific violation   identified in the   approved plan prior to 2 years after plan approval or the date on which consolidation is   completed, whichever is first.   [1414(h)].  Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>ENFORCEABLE REQUIREMENTS: Defines provisions that are enforceable (&#8220;applicable   requirements of this title&#8221;).    Applicable requirements are defined as requirements of 1412, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1441, or   1445; regulations   promulgated pursuant to those sections; schedules or requirements imposed pursuant to those   sections; and   requirements of, or permits issued under a State program which satisfies the requirements of    section 1413 or is   otherwise approved by EPA. [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>NOTIFICATION OF LOCAL OFFICIALS: In nonprimacy states, EPA is required to notify an   appropriate locally elected   public official before proceeding with an enforcement action. [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>EMERGENCY AUTHORITY PENALTY: The penalty for violating an order issued under   Section 1431 (Emergency Powers)   is increased from $5,000 per day to $15,000 per day. [1414] Sec. 113(d)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"4\"><\/p>\n<h2>IV. FUNDING FOR STATES AND WATER SYSTEMS<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"4A\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h3><a name=\"4A\">DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING   FUND<\/a><\/h3>\n<p>ESTABLISHMENT: EPA is required to enter into agreements with eligible States to make   capitalization grants to further   the health protection objectives of SDWA.  A total of $9.6 billion &#8212; $599 million in FY94 and   $1.0 billion annually &#8212; is   authorized in FY&#8217;s 95-2003.  To be eligible to receive a grant, a State must establish a drinking   water treatment   revolving loan fund and comply with other requirements of the DWSRF section. [1452(a),(m)]   Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>ALLOTMENT AND ELIGIBILITY: Through fiscal year 1997, funds will be allotted by the   formula used to distribute federal   grants to States for drinking water program implementation (&#8220;public water supply supervision   program&#8221;).  A minimum   grant amount of 1% will be available for all States, including Wyoming and DC.  Up to 0.33% is   available for allotment to   other specified areas (Virgin Islands, Guam, et. al.). Funds for FY98 and beyond will be allotted   based on the results of   the most recent Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) needs survey.  Eligible systems   are community water   systems and non-profit non-community water systems.  No loans can be made to Federal systems.   [1452(a),(i)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>LINK TO PRIMACY: States that lose primacy in the future, except for Wyoming, will not be   eligible for DWSRF grants.   [1452(a)(1)(F)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>LINK TO CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT: EPA is required to withhold DWSRF funds from   States that do not set up capacity   development programs (20% of DWSRF grant starting in FY99 for new system authority; and   10% in 2001,15% in 2002,   and 20% in 2003 for capacity development strategies).  Withholding for all capacity development   purposes is capped at   20% total. [1452(a)(1)(G)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>LINK TO OPERATOR CERTIFICATION: EPA is required to withhold 20% of DWSRF funds   if a State does not meet the   requirement for operator certification programs. [1452(a)(1)(G)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>USE OF FUNDS: DWSRF funds can be used for loans, loan guarantees, source of reserve and   security for leveraged   loans (proceeds of which are placed in the DWSRF), and other uses as allowed in the Act.  Funds   may be used by a   public water system only to &#8220;facilitate compliance with national primary drinking water   regulations&#8221; and &#8220;significantly   further the health protection objectives of this title.&#8221;  Small systems (fewer than 10,000 persons)   are to receive 15% of   annual assistance from a State&#8217;s DWSRF, to the extent such funds can be obligated for eligible   projects.  Disadvan-   taged systems may receive loan subsidies (including forgiveness of principal) up to 30% of a   State&#8217;s DWSRF annual   assistance. [1452(a)(2)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>INTENDED USE PLANS:  States must annually prepare, after providing for public review and   comment, an Intended   Use Plan that identifies how the DWSRF funds will be used.  States must give highest priority to   projects that address   the most serious risks to public health, are necessary to achieve compliance, and assist systems   most in need on a per   household basis.  Types of assistance which may be made using State loan funds are specifically   defined.  [1452(b),   1452(f)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>STATE MATCH: States must contribute an amount equal to 20% of the total federal   contribution.  State funds must be   received on or before the date federal funds are received, except that States may delay the deposit   of funds until no   later than September 30, 1999 for grant payments made for fiscal years 1994-1997. [1452(e)]   Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>SET-ASIDES: (Prior to allotment to States)  $10,000,000 per year is reserved for health effects   research and, starting in   FY 1998, $2,000,000 per year for unregulated contaminant monitoring.  An amount up to 2% of   the funds appropriated   may be reserved by EPA for technical assistance, and may be used to supplement fund-ing for   technical assistance   under Section 1442(e).   EPA may use up to 1.5% of funds for grants to Indian Tribes and Alaska   Native Villages for   public water systems.  Funds must also be reserved for operator training cost reimbursement if   there is no separate   appropriation. [1452(i),(n),(o),(q); 1419(d)(4)] Sec 130, Sec 123<\/p>\n<p>OTHER USES OF FUNDS: (After allotment to States)  Up to 4% of State allotment may be   used by the State for   administration of the fund.  An additional 2% may be used for small system technical assistance.     Up to ten percent   may be used for a combination of the following: PWSS activities, State capacity development   strategies, operator   certification programs, and source water protection programs. [1452(g)] Sec. 130   Up to 15% may be used for a combination of the following: loans for the acquisition of land or   conservation easements,   loans to implement voluntary source water protection measures; technical and financial assistance   to water systems as   part of a State capacity development strategy; delineations\/assessments of source water protection   areas; and   establishment and implementation of wellhead protection programs.  No single item can receive   greater than 10%.   [1452(a)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>COMBINED FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION: Financial administration can be combined with   other funds, such as the   Clean Water Act DWSRF, as long as separate accounts are maintained.  The authority to establish   assistance priorities   and oversight responsibilities will be carried out by the primacy agency. [1452(g)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Anytime after one year after a State establishes a DWSRF, but prior to   fiscal year 2002, the   Governor of a State may transfer 33% of the funds in the Drinking Water DWSRF to the Clean   Water Act DWSRF.  The   same dollar amount may be transferred from the Clean Water Act DWSRF to the Drinking Water   DWSRF.   Within 4   years, EPA must submit a report to Congress regarding implementation of the transfer provisions.    [Free standing   provision &#8212; Title III, Sec. 302]<\/p>\n<p>REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE: EPA is required to publish DWSRF regulations and   guidance as necessary.  The   regulations and guidance will address how States commit and expend allotted funds, use funds   efficiently, prevent   waste, fraud and abuse, and avoid the use of funds for expansion of public water systems.    Guidance and regulations   must also ensure that States and public water systems use accounting, audit, and fiscal procedures   that conform to   generally accepted accounting standards. [1452(g)(3)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>AUDITS: States are required to publish and submit to EPA a report every 2 years that describes   program activities and   expenditures and includes the most recent audit of the State&#8217;s program. [1452(g)(4)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>NEEDS SURVEY: EPA is required to perform an assessment of the capital improvement needs   of all eligible public   water systems, including Native American systems, and submit a report within 180 days of   passage of the Act.  Addi-   tional surveys will be conducted every 4 years thereafter. [1452(h)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>WATER CONSERVATION: Within two years of enactment of the 1996 amendments to the   SDWA, EPA must publish   guidelines for water conservation plans.  Within a year of publication of the guidelines, a State   may, as a condition of   receiving a DWSRF loan, require a water system to submit a water conservation plan.   [1455(a),(b)] Sec. 134<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"5\"><\/p>\n<h2>V. OTHER PROVISIONS<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"5A\"><\/p>\n<h3>PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SUPERVISION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>TIME FRAME FOR STATE PRIMACY: In order to maintain primary enforcement responsibility   for regulations   promulgated under the SDWA, States must adopt regulations that are no less stringent than   federal regulations within 2   years of the date of promulgation of the federal regulations.  EPA may grant an extension of 2   additional years if EPA   determines that the extension is necessary and justified. [1413(a)(1)] Sec. 112(a)<\/p>\n<p>ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY REQUIREMENT FOR PRIMACY: As a condition of primacy,   States must have the authority   for administrative penalties.  Specifically, for systems serving more than 10,000 persons,  States   must be able to assess   not less than $1,000 per day per violation.  For smaller systems, States must have authority which   is adequate to ensure   compliance.  The State may establish a maximum amount of administrative penalties which may   be imposed on a   public water system. [1413(a)]  Sec. 113(b)<\/p>\n<p>INTERIM PRIMACY: States with up-to-date primacy programs are considered to have interim   primacy for new   regulations promulgated by EPA beginning on the effective date of the State regulations adopted   and submitted by the   State, and ending at such time as EPA disapproves a State program. [Section 1413(c)] Sec.   112(a)<\/p>\n<p>PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISION GRANT:  The authorization for carrying out State   Public Water System   Supervision Programs (PWSS) is increased to $100 million for each of fiscal years 1997-2003.    [1443(a)] Sec. 124<\/p>\n<p>EPA PRIMACY: EPA is given authority to use funds from a State&#8217;s portion of the Public Water   System Supervision   Program grant to implement the program where the State does not have primary enforcement   responsibility (primacy).    EPA may cover a shortfall in funds by using a portion of a State&#8217;s DWSRF allocation to carry out   primary enforcement   authority.  If such funds are used, EPA must carry out all activities required of a State.  [1443(a)]   Sec. 124, [1452(a)(1)(F)]   Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"5B\"><\/p>\n<h3>FEDERAL AGENCIES<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: Contains a clear waiver of sovereign immunity for federal agencies   with respect to all federal,   State and local requirements.   Provides EPA with authority to issue an administrative penalty   order if EPA finds that a   federal agency has violated an applicable requirement of this title.  The penalty may not exceed   $25,000 per day per   violation.  Funds collected by a State from the federal government in fines or penalties must be   used by the State for   projects designed to improve or protect the environment or defray the costs of environmental   protection or enforcement.   [1447] Sec. 129(a)<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF ORDERS: Any interested party may obtain review in US District Court of an   administrative penalty order   issued by EPA to a federal agency. [1447] Sec. 129(a)<\/p>\n<p>CITIZEN ACTION: A citizen may bring an action for the collection of a penalty against a federal   agency that fails to pay   a penalty by the date which is 18 months after the effective date of the final order.  The citizen is   required to notify the   Attorney General and the affected federal agency 60 days before the suit is filed.   [1447] Sec.   129(b)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"5C\"><\/p>\n<h3>MISCELLANEOUS<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>LEAD LEACHING STANDARD: If a voluntary standard for the leaching of lead from new   plumbing fittings and fixtures is   not established within one year of the effective date of the Act, then EPA must promulgate   regulations setting a   performance based standard for lead leaching levels from such components. (Note: A voluntary   standard is now in   place.) [1417]  Sec. 118<\/p>\n<p>LEAD PROHIBITION: Two years after enactment, it becomes illegal for any pipe or  plumbing   fixture that is not lead-free   to be introduced into commerce.  The exception is pipes used in manufacturing or industrial   processing.  It will also be   illegal, two years after enactment, to sell solder or flux that is not lead-free.  Solder that is not   lead-free may be sold if  it   bears a prominent label stating that it is illegal to use it in the installation or repair of plumbing   providing water for   human consumption. [1417] Sec. 118<\/p>\n<p>LIMITED ALTERNATIVE TO FILTRATION: States may allow unfiltered water systems with   surface water sources to use   treatment other than filtration.  In order to qualify for alternative treatment,  a water system  must   have an uninhabited,   undeveloped watershed in consolidated ownership and have control over access to and activities   in the watershed.    The alternative treatment must ensure greater removal or inactivation efficiencies of pathogenic   organisms than would   be achieved by the combination of filtration and chlorine disinfection required by section 1412   (b)(7)(C). [1412(b)(7)(C)]   Sec. 106<\/p>\n<p>GRANTS FOR ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGES: The Administrator is authorized to make grants   to the State of  Alaska to   pay 50 percent of the cost of improving sanitation for rural and Alaska Native villages.  Grants   will be for development   and construction of  public water and wastewater systems and also for training, technical   assistance, and educational   programs.  The State may use up to 4 percent of the amount of the grant for related   administrative expenses.  EPA is   required to consult with the State of Alaska to prioritize the needs of individual villages.    Authorization for this provision   is at $15,000,000 for each FY&#8217;97-2000. Title III&#8211;Sec.  303<\/p>\n<p>RELATIONSHIP OF GRANTS TO DWSRF FUND: A &#8220;Sense of the Congress&#8221;  states that   appropriations for grants   should not be provided for watershed protection in New York City&#8217;s watersheds, sanitation   improvements at colonias, or   sanitation improvements for Alaska Native Villages if such appropriations would prevent   adequate funding for state   revolving loan funds. Title III&#8211;Sec 304<\/p>\n<p>WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT: Congress grants consent for the District of Columbia, Arlington   County, VA and the city of   Falls Church to establish an entity to operate, maintain and manage the Washington Aqueduct.    The Secretary of the   Army is required to develop a plan, within 1 year, for the transfer of the Washington Aqueduct to   a non-Federal entity.    The Corps of Engineers is authorized to borrow up to $29 million in 1997, 424 million for 1998,   and $22 million for 1999 to   carry out capital improvements until the time of transfer.  ( Title III&#8211;Sec. 304.)  The Secretary of   the Army may not pass   on the costs of an enforcement penalty to the customers of the Washington Aqueduct system.   [1447]  Sec.129(c)<\/p>\n<p>DRINKING WATER FUNDS FOR COLONIAS: EPA and other appropriate Federal agencies   are authorized to award   grants to Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas, to provide assistance  (up to 50% of   project costs) to colonias   where the residents are subject to a significant health risk attributable to the lack of access to an   adequate and   affordable drinking water system.   Appropriations of $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years   1997 through 1999 is   authorized. [1456] Sec. 135<\/p>\n<p>WASTEWATER FUNDS FOR COLONIAS: The Administrator is authorized to make grants for   planning, design,   construction, or improvement of  sewers, treatment works, and appropriate connections for   wastewater treatment for   colonias.  Grants cannot exceed 50 percent of the cost of carrying out any project.  $25 million is   authorized for this   provision in fiscal years 1997 through 1999.  Title III&#8211;Sec. 307<\/p>\n<p>ZEBRA MUSSEL CONTROL: The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control   Act of 1990 is amended to   include Lake Champlain at 16 U.S.C. 4701(a).  Provision references zebra mussel control in Lake   Champlain.  Title III&#8211;Sec. 308<\/p>\n<p>DEFINITIONAL CHANGE FOR ANALYTIC METHODS:  Modifies the pre-existing   requirement that national primary   drinking water regulations (NPDWR) contain quality control and testing procedures for   compliance purposes to now   require &#8220;accepted methods for&#8221; quality control and testing procedures.   After the promulgation of   a NPDWR, EPA is   allowed to &#8220;add equally effective&#8221; quality control and testing procedures through guidance   published in the Federal   Register. [1401]  Sec. 101(a)<\/p>\n<p>DEFINITION OF COMMUNITY\/NONCOMMUNITY SYSTEM: &#8220;Community water system&#8221; is   defined as a public water   system that has at least 15 service connections or serves 25 persons year-round.   &#8220;Noncommunity   water system&#8221; is   defined as a public water system that is not a community water system. [1401] Sec. 101(a)<\/p>\n<p>OPEN CONVEYANCES: The general definition of &#8220;public water system&#8221; (PWS) is broadened   from water systems that   deliver water through pipes to include systems that use &#8220;construct-ed conveyances.&#8221;  However,   certain connections   that might otherwise qualify a system as a public water system under the broadened definition are   excluded from   consideration where: the water is not used for &#8220;residential uses&#8221;;  alternative water is provided for   drinking and cooking;   or water for drinking, cooking, and bathing is treated (centrally or by point of entry).  Alternative   or treated water must   provide a level of health protection equivalent to the applicable standard(s).  A transition period   of 2 years is provided   for compliance. [1401]  Sec. 101(b)<\/p>\n<p>RETURN FLOW: Repeals Section 3013 of PL 102-486 (Energy Act).  Deletes Energy Act   provision which encourages the   use of heat exchange units.  Title III<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"5D\"><\/p>\n<h3>ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR WATER   INFRASTRUCTURE AND WATERSHEDS<br \/>\n(Title IV&#8211;does not amend the SDWA)<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>GRANT AUTHORITY: EPA may provide technical and financial assistance in the form of grants   to States for water   supply improvements and for source water quality programs consistent with Section 319 of the   Clean Water Act (to   address contaminants for the purpose of making supplies usable for water systems).  Not more   than 30% of funds   appropriated may be used for Section 319 activities.  Title IV<\/p>\n<p>USE OF GRANTS: As a condition for receiving a grant, a State must ensure that assistance will   be used in the most   cost-effective manner.  The Federal share of activities funded with grants shall be 50 percent. Title   IV<\/p>\n<p>FUNDING LEVELS: Annual funding of $25 million is authorized for grants for fiscal years   1997-2003.  An additional $25   million is authorized for each fiscal year 1997-2003 if the appropriations for the Drinking Water   DWSRF exceed 75% of   the authorized level ($1 billion is authorized for the DWSRF).  Title IV<br \/>\n<!-- #EndEditable --> <!-- END CONTENT AREA --><\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"95%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"4\" valign=\"top\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/images\/epafiles_misc_space.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" hspace=\"69\" vspace=\"2\" width=\"2\" height=\"1\" \/><\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"4\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/images\/epafiles_misc_space.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"5\" height=\"5\" \/><\/td>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><!-- BEGIN AREA FOOTER --> <!-- ADD LINKS AND TEXT FOR AREA FOOTER WITHIN THIS PARAGRAPH TAG --><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/index.html\">Safewater Home<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/about.html\">About Our Office<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pubs\/index.html\">Publications<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/links.html\">Links<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/water\/index.html\">Office of Water<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/agua.html\">En Espa\u00f1ol<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/drinklink.html\">Contact Us<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/new.html\">What&#8217;s New <\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p><a name=\"1A\"><\/p>\n<h3>SOURCE WATER PROTECTION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS: Establishes a new Section 1453 for source water quality   assessments.  States with PWSS primacy shall submit source water assessment programs to EPA   for approval.  EPA is required to publish guidance to States by August 6, 1997.  States must   submit their program to EPA no later than 18 months after EPA publishes guidance.   A State   program is automatically approved 9 months after submittal to EPA unless EPA disapproves   program. [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>PROGRAM ELEMENTS: A State assessment program is required to: (1) delineate the   boundaries of the areas providing source waters for public water systems, and (2) identify (to the   extent practicable) the origins of regulated and certain unregulated contaminants in the delineated   area to determine the susceptibility of public water systems to such contaminants. [1453] Sec.   132(a)<\/p>\n<p>TIME FRAME FOR ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are to be completed for all public water   systems within 2 years after EPA approval of the State&#8217;s program.  EPA may extend this period   up to 18 months taking into account funds made available to the State under the Drinking Water   State Revolving Fund (DWSRF).  States shall make the results of the source water assessments   available to the public.  [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>USE OF OTHER AUTHORITIES: To avoid duplication, assessments may make use of sanitary   surveys, State wellhead protection programs, pesticide State management plans, State watershed   initiatives including efforts under the Surface Water Treatment Rule, and efforts under the Federal   Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act). [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>ASSESSMENT LINK TO ALTERNATIVE MONITORING: For a State to tailor alternative  \t\tmonitoring requirements for public water systems under a new permanent  \t\tmonitoring relief authority (Section 1418), a State must have an EPA approved  \t\tsource water assessment program. Any public water system seeking alternative  \t\tmonitoring requirements under a State&#8217;s permanent monitoring relief authority  \t\tmust have a complete source water assessment. [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>DWSRF FUNDS FOR SOURCE WATER PROTECTION: A State may use up to 10% of its   DWSRF allotment in both FY 1996 and 1997 to delineate and assess source water protection   areas.  Loans may also be used to acquire land or conservation easements to protect source   waters and to implement voluntary measures to facilitate compliance.  A State may use up to an   additional 10% of its DWSRF allotment to administer or provide technical assistance through   source water protection programs. [1452(g), (k)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: EPA is to conduct a demonstration project of the most effective   and protective means of assessing and protecting source waters serving large metropolitan areas   and located on Federal lands.  [1453] Sec. 132(a)<\/p>\n<p>PETITION PROGRAM: A new authority is established for a source water petition program.    States may establish a program to receive, approve and respond to petitions from a public water   system operator\/ owner or local government entity to assist in the development of voluntary local   incentive-based partnerships to (1) reduce the presence of contaminants, (2) provide financial or   technical assistance requested, and (3) develop recommendations for voluntary, long-term source   water protection strategies. [1454] Sec. 133(a)<\/p>\n<p>CONTAMINANTS ADDRESSED BY PETITIONS: Petitions may address only either   pathogenic organisms which are regulated (or for which regulation is required) or contaminants   detected that are not found &#8220;reliably and consistently&#8221; below the MCL. [1454] Sec. 133(a)<\/p>\n<p>RESPONSE TO PETITIONS: In responding to source water petitions, a State is to provide, at a   minimum, information on: priority of the public health concern identified by the petition; funds   available;  and technical\/financial assistance available from other Federal and State programs,   including the DWSRF and programmatic grants of the CWA, Section 6217 of the Coastal Zone   Act, Title XI of the Food Security Act, sole source aquifer, wellhead protection, pesticide-ground   water management plans, etc. [1454]  Sec. 133(a)<\/p>\n<p>USE OF CLEAN WATER ACT FUNDS: A &#8220;Sense of Congress&#8221; provision states that priorities   established under section 606(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act give special   consideration to projects recommended pursuant to local source water petitions. [Free standing&#8211;   does not amend SDWA]  Sec.133(b)<\/p>\n<p>GRANTS FOR STATE PROGRAMS: By August 7, 1997, EPA is to publish guidance to assist   States in developing source water quality protection partnership programs, and to assist local   governments and community water systems in developing partnerships and assessing source water   quality.  State grants of $5 million are authorized to carry out such programs. [1454(c)] Sec.   133(a)  Also, up to 10% of a State&#8217;s DWSRF allotment can be used by States for responding to   petitions. [1452(g), (k)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>WELLHEAD PROTECTION: Annual funding for States wellhead protection programs is   reauthorized for FYs 1997-2003 at $30 million, underground injection control programs at $15   million, and critical aquifer protection at $15 million. [1428(k)] Sec. 120.  States may use up to   10% of their DWSRF allotment to implement their wellhead protection programs. [1452(g)]  Sec.   130<\/p>\n<p>NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED: Establishes the New York City watershed protection   program.  EPA is authorized to provide financial assistance to State of New York for   demonstration projects implemented as part of the watershed program for the protection and   enhancement of the quality of source waters of the New York City water supply system.  Within 5   years, the Governor of New York is to provide EPA with a report on the results of funded   projects.  $15 million grant to New York is authorized for each fiscal year 1997 to 2003.   [1443(d)] Sec. 128<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"1B\"><\/p>\n<h3>STATE GROUND WATER PROTECTION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>GROUND WATER GRANTS FOR STATES: Establishes a new Section 1429 for state ground   water protection programs.  EPA may make grants to States to develop programs to ensure   coordinated and comprehensive protection of ground water resources within the State.  $15   million is authorized for State grants for each fiscal year 1997 to 2003. [1429] Sec. 131<\/p>\n<p>GROUND WATER GRANT GUIDANCE: By August 6, 1997, and annually thereafter, EPA is   to publish guidance establishing procedures for State grant applications. [1429] Sec. 131<\/p>\n<p>REPORT TO CONGRESS: By August, 1999, and every three years thereafter, EPA is to report   to Congress on the quality of the Nation&#8217;s ground waters and effectiveness of State programs for   ground water protection. [1429] Sec. 131<br \/>\n<a name=\"1C\"><\/p>\n<h3>CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>NEW SYSTEM AUTHORITY: By October 1, 1999, each State must obtain the authority to   ensure that new community water systems and non-transient noncommunity water systems have   the technical, financial, and managerial capacity to meet National Primary Drinking Water   Regulations.  A State will receive only 80% of its DWSRF allotment unless the State has such   authority.  [1420(a)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>SYSTEMS IN SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANCE: States must prepare and submit to EPA by   August 6, 1997 (and periodically update) a list of community water systems and non-transient,   non-community water systems that have a history of significant noncompliance, and the reasons   for their noncompliance.  States must report to EPA in 5 years on the success of efforts to assist   small systems in improving capacity. [1420(b)] Sec.119<\/p>\n<p>STATE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES: States are required to establish capacity   development strategies to assist systems in developing and maintaining technical, financial and   management capacity.  States not developing and implementing a strategy receive only 90% of   their DWSRF allotment in Fiscal Year 2001; 85% in 2002; and 80% in each subsequent fiscal   year. [1420(c)] Sec. 119.  The total withholding for all capacity development provisions may not   exceed 20%.  [1452(a)(1)(G)].  Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>CONTENT OF STATE STRATEGY: In preparing its capacity development strategy, each State   shall:  consider the criteria it will use to identify public water supplies most in need of improved   capacity; describe factors that encourage or impair capacity development;  describe how the State   will use its authorities to assist systems in complying, encourage partnerships between systems,   and assist in training\/certification of operators; describe how the State will measure progress; and   identify parties interested in capacity development [1420(c)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>EPA INFORMATION: Within 180 days of enactment, EPA is to conduct a review of existing   State capacity development efforts and publish information to assist States and water systems in   capacity development efforts.   Within 2 years of enactment EPA is to develop guidance, in   consultation with the States, describing legal authorities and other means to ensure that new   systems demonstrate technical, financial, and managerial capacity. [1420(d)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>EFFECT OF REGULATIONS ON CAPACITY: When promulgating new regulations, EPA must   include an analysis of the likely effect of regulations on the technical, financial, and managerial   capacity of water systems. [1420(d)(3)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>REPORT ON STATE PROGRESS: States must make available to the public a report to the   Governor (within 2 years and every 3 years thereafter) on the efficacy of their capacity   development strategy and progress in improving water system capacity. [1420(c)(3)]  Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>LINK TO DWSRF ASSISTANCE: Systems that are in significant noncompliance or lack   technical, financial and managerial capacity to ensure compliance may not receive DWSRF   assistance unless the assistance will ensure compliance and, where the system lacks capacity, the   system agrees to undertake appropriate changes, as the State deems necessary, to ensure capacity.   [1452(a)(3)]  Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>FINANCE CENTERS: EPA is authorized to provide initial funding for one or more   university-based environmental finance centers (including a national public water system capacity   development clearinghouse) that would provide technical assistance to State and local officials in   developing the financial and managerial capacity of public water systems.  $1,500,000 is   authorized for each fiscal year 1997-2003.  [1420(g)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>TECHNOLOGY ASSISTANCE CENTERS: EPA is authorized to make grants to universities to   establish and operate small public water system technology assistance centers.  The centers would   conduct training and technical assistance relating to the information, performance, and technical   needs of small water systems.  Criteria are provided for EPA to use to select grant recipients.  $2   million is authorized for each of the fiscal years 1997 through 1999 and $5 million for each of the   fiscal years 2000 through 2003. [1420(f)] Sec. 119<br \/>\n<a name=\"1D\"><\/p>\n<h3>OPERATOR CERTIFICATION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>CERTIFICATION PARTNERSHIP: Within 180 days EPA must initiate a partnership with   States, Public Water Systems, and the public to develop information on recommended operator   certification requirements.   The information developed through this partnership must be published   within 18 months of enactment. [1420(d)] Sec. 119<\/p>\n<p>CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES: Within 30 months of enactment, in cooperation with the   States, EPA must publish guidelines specifying minimum standards for certification and   recertification of operators of community and nontransient, noncommunity water systems.   [1419(a)]  Existing State programs are to be considered substantially equivalent to the guidelines   unless the existing program fails to achieve the overall public health objectives of the guidelines.   [1419(c)] Sec. 123<\/p>\n<p>STATE PROGRAMS: Beginning 2 years after guidelines are published, 20% of a State&#8217;s DWSRF   allotment will be withheld if the State is not implementing an operator certification program.   [1419(b)] Sec. 123<\/p>\n<p>TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT: EPA, through grants to the States (allocated on the basis of   &#8220;reasonable costs&#8221;), is required to reimburse training and certification costs for operators of   systems serving fewer than 3,300, including per diem for unsalaried operators, who are required   to undergo training as a result of the Federal requirement.  Grants of $30 million are authorized,   and DWSRF funds may used if appropriations are not sufficient. [1419(d)] Sec. 123<br \/>\n<a name=\"2\"><\/p>\n<h2>II. CONSUMER INFORMATION<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"2A\"><\/p>\n<h3>CONSUMER AWARENESS<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORTS: Community water systems are to prepare an annual   &#8220;consumer confidence   report&#8221; on the source of their drinking water and the levels of contaminants found in the drinking   water.  The report is to   be sent to all customers by mail.  The report is required annually, and must include: (1)   information on the source of   drinking water, (2) brief definitions of terms, (3) (if regulated contaminants are found) the MCLG,   MCL, and the level   found, (4) (if MCL is violated) information on health effects, and (5) information on levels of   unregulated contaminants (if   required by EPA regulations).  [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>COVERAGE: Governors may allow systems serving fewer than 10,000 persons to publish the   report in a local news-   paper, in lieu of mailing.   Governors may also allow systems serving fewer than 500 people to   notify customers that the   report is available, in lieu of mailing.  The report is required annually.  States may adopt   alternative requirements for   the form and content of consumer confidence reports (through State regulation). [1414(c)(4)]   Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>EPA REGULATIONS: EPA must issue regulations within 2 years of enactment, that establish the   requirements for the   consumer confidence reports.  These regulations must be developed in consultation with public   water systems,   environmental groups, public interest groups,  risk communication experts, and the States.  The   regulations must   include plainly worded definitions of &#8220;maximum contaminant level goal,&#8221; &#8220;maximum contaminant   level,&#8221; &#8220;variances,&#8221;   and &#8220;exemptions,&#8221; as well as plain-language explanations of the health concerns associated with   contaminants.   [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>HOTLINE: EPA is required to have a Hotline for consumers to provide more information on   drinking water contaminants   and potential health effects. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>BOTTLED WATER CONSUMER STUDY: The Food and Drug Administration is required to   publish in 18 months for   public comment, a study on the feasibility of appropriate methods for informing consumers of the   contents of bottled   water.  The final study is to be done in 30 months. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(b)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"2B\"><\/p>\n<h3>PUBLIC NOTIFICATION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Clarifies general requirements for public notification of   violations of any MCL, treatment   technique, testing procedure, or monitoring requirement, and the existence  or violation of a   variance or exemption.    The general requirement includes unregulated contaminants if (as in the old law) notice is required   by EPA regulations.    The basis for EPA&#8217;s public notification regulation is altered to clarify those violations requiring 24   hour notice and those   that may be provided at a later date.  States are allowed to adopt alternative &#8220;form and content&#8221;   of public notice   through State regulation. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>VIOLATIONS WITH SERIOUS EFFECTS: Notices for violations with potential to have   &#8220;serious adverse effect&#8221; must   contain an explanation of the violation, the potential health effects, what the system is doing to   correct the problem, and   whether consumers need to use an alternate source of water.  Recipients of such notices must   include consumers and   the State.  Notices must be given by &#8220;appropriate&#8221; broadcast media and newspaper serving area,   or posted door-to-door in lieu of broadcast media\/newspaper.  Notices must be given within 24   hours after occurrence of violation.   [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>OTHER VIOLATIONS: EPA is to prescribe the form and manner of the notice for violations that   do not have the potential   to have a &#8220;serious adverse effect.&#8221;  Persons served by a system must receive the notice in the first   bill after the violation,   in an annual report, or by mail or direct delivery within a year. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>STATE REPORTS: Each State is required to prepare an annual report on violations.  States are   also required to publish   and distribute summaries of the report and specify where the full report is available.  The first   report is due on January   1, 1998. [1414(c)] Sec. 114(a)<\/p>\n<p>EPA REPORTS: EPA is required to prepare an annual report summarizing States&#8217; reports and   public notices submitted   by Indian Tribes.  The report will include EPA recommendations on resources needed to improve   compliance and will   discuss EPA enforcement activity against, and financial assistance to, Indian reservations.  EPA&#8217;s   first report is due in   July, 1998.  [1414(c)]  Sec. 114(a)<br \/>\n<a name=\"3\"><\/p>\n<h2>III.  REGULATORY PROGRAM<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"3A\"><\/p>\n<h3>CONTAMINANT SELECTION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>GENERAL AUTHORITY: EPA&#8217;s general authority to set an MCLG and to regulate a   contaminant is modified to apply to   contaminants that:  may adversely effect human health; are known or likely to occur at a   frequency and level of public   health concern in public water systems; and for which regulation presents a meaning-ful   opportunity for health risk   reduction for persons served by public water systems.  [Section 1412(b)] Sec. 102(a)<\/p>\n<p>GOOD SCIENCE:  Continues the old law&#8217;s requirement that EPA consult with the EPA&#8217;s Science   Advisory Board and   National Drinking Water Advisory Council in promulgating regulations.  A provision is added   requiring EPA to use the   &#8220;best available, peer-reviewed science&#8221; and data collected by accepted or best available methods   in carrying out   science-related actions under Section 1412 (&#8220;National Drinking Water Regulations&#8221;).  [1412(b)]   Sec.103<\/p>\n<p>OCCURRENCE DATABASE: EPA must establish an occurrence database within 3 years of   enactment.  In establishing   the database, EPA must solicit recommendations from the Science Advisory Board, States, and   other interested parties.     The database is to include information on unregulated contaminants for which monitoring is   required by EPA, and   regulated contaminants detected at quantifiable levels (whether or not the level constitutes a   violation of a standard).     The information in the database must be made available to the public in a readily accessible form.   [1445(g)] Sec. 126<\/p>\n<p>CONTAMINANT LIST: Within 18 months of  enactment and every 5 years thereafter, EPA will   publish a list of   contaminants not subject to any proposed or final national primary drinking water regulation and   which are known or   anticipated to occur in public water systems and may require regulation.  In developing the list,   EPA must consult with   the scientific community, allow for public comment, and consider the occurrence database   (established under Section   1445).  [1412(b)] Sec. 102(a)<\/p>\n<p>DETERMINATION OF WHETHER TO REGULATE: The requirement that EPA regulate 25   additional contaminants every 3   years is eliminated.  Instead, starting five years from the date of enactment and every 5 years   thereafter, EPA is   required to determine whether or not to regulate at  least 5 of the contaminants listed as potential   contaminants for   regulation (see &#8220;contaminant list&#8221; above).  EPA is directed to make determinations for   contaminants that present the   greatest public health concern.  In selecting such contaminants, EPA must take into consideration   the effect of   contaminants upon sensitive subpopulations, such as infants, children, pregnant women, the   elderly, and individuals   with a history of serious illness.  Within 2 years after a determination to regulate a contaminant,   EPA must propose a   maximum contaminant level goal and national primary drinking water regulation.  EPA must   publish an MCLG and   final national primary drinking water regulation 18 months thereafter.  [1412(b)] Sec. 102(b)   (related to &#8220;25 every 3   years&#8221;) and Sec. 104(a) (related to &#8220;determination&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>URGENT THREATS: EPA (after consultation with the Department of Health and Human   Services) may issue interim   regulations for any contaminant which poses an urgent threat to human health without making the   usual   &#8220;determination to regulate&#8221; (see above)  and completing the cost-benefit analysis (see &#8220;standards   and regulation   development&#8221; below).  However a cost-benefit analysis and the required determination (to   regulate or not) must be   done within 3 years after the interim rule, and the rule must be repromulgated or  revised if   necessary.  [1412(b)] Sec.   102(a)<br \/>\n<a name=\"3B\"><\/p>\n<h3>STANDARDS AND REGULATION   DEVELOPMENT<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>RISK COMMUNICATION: In support of each regulation, EPA must make available to the   public a document that   specifies, to the extent practicable, the population addressed by the regulation; the central, upper   and lower estimates   of risk; significant uncertainties and studies that would help resolve uncertainties; and   peer-reviewed studies that   support or fail to support estimates.  [1412(b)] Sec. 103<\/p>\n<p>COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Whenever EPA proposes a national primary drinking water   regulation, EPA must publish a   cost-benefit analysis.  The analysis for alternative MCLs must include, among other things,   consideration of effects on   sensitive subpopulations.   The analysis for treatment technique regulations must take into account   &#8220;as appropriate&#8221;   the cost and benefit factors required for an MCL regulation.  EPA may identify health benefit   measurement and valua-   tion methods, including consumer &#8220;willingness to pay&#8221; for reductions in health risks. [1412(b)]   Sec. 103<\/p>\n<p>SETTING MCLs: The new law retains the old requirement that MCLs be set as close to MCLGs   &#8220;as is feasible,&#8221; except   when EPA determines that the cost of a standard at that level are not justified by the benefits, or   when certain &#8220;risk-risk&#8221;   considerations apply.  [1412(b)] Sec. 104<\/p>\n<p>STANDARD SETTING FLEXIBILITY: When EPA proposes an MCL, EPA must publish a   determination as to whether the   costs of the standard are justified by the benefits.  If EPA determines that the costs of an MCL are   not justified by the   benefits, the law allows EPA to set an MCL that maximizes health risk reduction benefits at a cost   that is justified by the   benefits.  [1412(b)(6)] Sec. 104<\/p>\n<p>LIMITATION ON FLEXIBILITY: EPA cannot use the authority to adjust the MCL from the   feasible level if the benefits are   justified (at the feasible level) for systems that serve 10,000 or more persons and for systems that   are unlikely to receive   a variance.  [1412(b)(6)] Sec. 104<\/p>\n<p>RISK-RISK CONSIDERATIONS: EPA may consider &#8220;risk-risk&#8221; tradeoffs when setting an MCL.    An MCL may be set at a   level other than the feasible level if the technology to meet the MCL would increase health risk by   (i) increasing   concentration of other contaminants in drinking water, or (ii) interfering with treatment used to   comply with other   primary drinking water regulations.  When establishing such an MCL, EPA shall (i) minimize   overall risk by balancing   both the risk reductions from treating the individual contaminant with possible side-effects of such   treatment on   concentrations of other contaminants, and (ii) assure that the combination of treatments for the   individual contaminant   and other contaminants shall not be more stringent than the &#8220;feasible&#8221; standard.  [1412(b)(5)] Sec.   104<\/p>\n<p>JUDICIAL REVIEW: EPA&#8217;s determination of whether an MCL&#8217;s benefits justify the cost is   judicially reviewable only as part   of a Court&#8217;s review of the associated primary drinking water regulation. [1412(b)(6)] Sec. 104<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF STANDARDS: The requirement for EPA to review every regulation is changed   from 3 years to 6 years.  EPA   shall revise national primary drinking water standards, as appropriate.  Any revisions must be in   accordance with the   new provisions of section 1412, except that each revision &#8220;shall maintain, or provide for greater,   protection of the health   of persons.&#8221;  [1412(b)(9)] Sec. 104(c)<\/p>\n<p>GROUND WATER DISINFECTION: EPA shall issue regulations requiring disinfection &#8220;as   necessary&#8221; for ground water   systems.  These regulations shall be issued at any time after August 1999 and no later than the   final disinfection   byproducts Stage II rule.  After consultation with the States, EPA shall promulgate criteria for   determining whether   disinfection shall be required as a treatment technique for groundwater systems.  [1412(b)(8)]   Sec. 107<\/p>\n<p>EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS: National primary drinking water regulations shall take   effect 3 years from date of   promulgation unless EPA determines an earlier date is &#8220;practicable.&#8221;  An additional 2 years for   compliance may be   provided if necessary for capital improvements.  [1412(b)(10)] Sec. 108<\/p>\n<p>FILTER BACKWASH: Not later than August 2000, EPA shall promulgate a regulation for filter   backwash recycling within   the treatment process of public water supply systems, unless such recycling has been addressed in   the Enhanced   Surface Water Treatment Rule prior to that date.  [1412(b)(14)] Sec. 110<\/p>\n<p>REGULATION DEVELOPMENT FUNDING: $35 million is authorized for conducting studies,   assessments, and analyses   in support of regulations or the development of methods for fiscal years 1996-2003.   [1412(b)(3)(C)] Sec. 103<\/p>\n<p>BOTTLED WATER STANDARDS: FDA is required to regulate the same contaminants in   bottled water that EPA regulates   in public water supplies, unless the FDA makes a finding that such a regulation is not necessary to   protect public   health.  The standard of quality regulation for bottled water shall be &#8220;no less stringent&#8221; than the   MCL established by a   national primary drinking water regulation, and the regulations must include appropriate   monitoring requirements.   [Section 410 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act] Sec. 305<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"3C\"><\/p>\n<h3>ARSENIC, SULFATE, RADON, DISINFECTION   BYPRODUCTS<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>ARSENIC STUDY PLAN: 180 days after enactment, EPA must develop an arsenic study plan to   assess health risks   associated with exposure to low levels of arsenic.  In conducting this study, EPA must consult   with, and may enter into a   cooperative agreement with, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), other Federal agencies,   and interested   stakeholders.  [1412(b)(12)(A)] Sec. 109(a)<\/p>\n<p>ARSENIC DEADLINES: EPA must propose an arsenic national primary drinking water   regulation by January 1, 2000 and    issue a final regulation by January 1, 2001.  [1412(b)(12)(A)] Sec. 109(a)<\/p>\n<p>SULFATE STUDY AND REGULATION: Prior to regulating sulfate, EPA and CDC must   conduct a study of the dose   response relationship for adverse human health effects from sulfate in drinking water, including   effects on populations   at greater risk.  The study shall be completed not later than 30 months after the date of enactment.    Sulfate must be   among the 5 contaminants considered for regulation in the first 5 year cycle.  If sulfate is   regulated, &#8220;notification&#8221; and   &#8220;alternative&#8221; water must be included as means of compliance.  [1412(b)(12)(B)] Sec. 109(a)<\/p>\n<p>RADON STUDY BY NAS: EPA will arrange for the NAS to prepare a risk assessment for radon   and an assessment of   risk reduction benefits from various mitigation measures.  [1412(b)(13)] Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>RADON STANDARD: Within 30 months of enactment, EPA will publish a health risk reduction   and cost analysis   associated with possible maximum contaminant levels.  Within 3 years after enactment, EPA is to   propose a maximum   contaminant level goal and drinking water regulation for radon.  The final rule must be   promulgated 1 year thereafter.   [1412(b)(13)] Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>ALTERNATIVE RADON STANDARD: EPA is required to also establish an &#8220;alternative MCL&#8221;   for radon if the MCL is set a   level that is &#8220;more stringent than necessary to reduce the contribution to radon in indoor air from   drinking water to a   concentration that is equivalent to the national average concentration of radon in outdoor air.&#8221;    The level of the   alternative MCL is linked to average outdoor radon levels.  If an alternative MCL is established,   then EPA must publish   guidelines for States to develop multimedia radon programs. [1412(b)(13)] Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>STATE MULTIMEDIA RADON PROGRAMS: Water systems may comply with the alternative   MCL in a State that submits   a multimedia radon program that is approved by EPA.   EPA approval is required if a State&#8217;s   program is expected to   achieve risk reduction benefits that are equal or greater than the benefits that would be achieved   by implementing the   (regular) MCL.  EPA&#8217;s approval or disapproval is required within 180 day of receipt of the State   submittal.  The   compliance date of the radon regulation is extended for 18 months in a State if the Governor of a   State submits a letter   to EPA (within 90 days after the regulation is promulgated) committing to develop a multimedia   program.  [1412(b)(13)]  Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF MULTIMEDIA RADON PROGRAMS: EPA is to review State multimedia   programs every 5 years, and may   withdraw approval of programs that do not meet the approval requirements (achieving equal or   greater risk reduction).    Individual public water systems may also submit mitigation programs where a State fails to submit   a program or where   the State program is disapproved.  [1412(b)(13)]  Sec. 109(b)<\/p>\n<p>SCHEDULE FOR MICROBIAL\/ DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS: EPA will promulgate an   Interim Enhanced Surface   Water Treatment rule, a Final Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, a Stage I Disinfectants   and Disinfection Bypro-   ducts Rule, and a Stage II Disinfection Byproducts Rule in accordance with a February 10, 1994   Federal Register   notice.  If schedule delays occur, all subsequent rules must be completed no later than a revised   date reflecting the   intervals for the rule.  [1412(b)(8)]  Sec. 102<\/p>\n<p>DBP STANDARD-SETTING AND RISK-RISK: EPA may use &#8220;risk-risk&#8221; considerations in   setting DBP Stage I and II   standards.  The considerations used in proposing the DBP rule in 1994 (developed through a   regulatory negotiation)   &#8220;shall be treated as consistent&#8221; with the risk-risk authority for the purpose of finalizing the DBP   regulations. [Free   standing provision &#8212; does not amend SDWA.] Sec. 104(b)<\/p>\n<p>DBP STANDARD-SETTING: EPA may not use the standard setting flexibility (1412(b)(6)(A)0   to establish an MCL in Stage   I and Stage II of the DBP rule, or for Cryptosporidium.  EPA may use such authority to establish   ground water   disinfection regulations. [1412(b)(6)(C)]  Sec. 104(a)(b)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"3D\"><\/p>\n<h3>DRINKING WATER STUDIES AND   RESEARCH<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS: EPA must conduct studies to understand the mechanisms by   which chemicals cause   adverse effects and on new approaches for studying the adverse effects of contaminant mixtures in   drinking water.    [1458(b)] Sec. 137<\/p>\n<p>MICROBIAL\/DBP STUDIES: Within 180 days of enactment EPA, after consultation with HHS   and USDA, must conduct   studies to support the development of the DBP\/microbial pathogen rules.  The authorization to   conduct the studies is   $12.5 million annually for 1997- 2003.  The studies must include: toxicological and, if warranted,   epidemiological studies   to determine the adverse effects from disinfectants and disinfectant by-products; and the   development of   dose-response curves for Cryptosporidium and Norwalk virus.  [1458(c)] Sec. 137<\/p>\n<p>WATERBORNE DISEASE STUDIES AND INFORMATION: Within 2 years of enactment,   EPA and CDC must conduct pilot   waterborne disease occurrence studies for at least 5 major U.S. communities or public water   systems and within 5   years of enactment must prepare a report on the findings and provide a national estimate of   waterborne disease   occurrence.  EPA and CDC must establish a national training and public education campaign to   educate professional   health care providers and the general public about waterborne disease and the symptoms that may   be caused by   infectious agents, including microbial contaminants. The authorization for these activities is $3   million\/year for 1997   through 2001.  [1458(d)] Sec. 137<\/p>\n<p>SENSITIVE SUBPOPULATIONS: Within 4 years of enactment, and periodically as new data   becomes available, EPA   must conduct studies to identify subpopulations at greater risk (e.g., infants, children, pregnant   women) than the   general public of adverse health effects from exposure to contaminants in drinking water,   and   report to Congress on   the results of studies.  [1458(a)] Sec. 137<\/p>\n<p>SCREENING FOR ESTROGENIC SUBSTANCES: EPA may conduct testing under Section   408(p) of the Food, Drug and   Cosmetic Act screening program for substances that may be found in sources of drinking water in   which a substantial   population may be exposed.  [1457] Sec. 136<\/p>\n<p>RESEARCH FUNDS: Funds &#8220;as may be necessary&#8221; are authorized for research, not to exceed   $26.593 million, for   drinking water research for fiscal years 1997-2003.  Title II&#8211;Sec. 201<\/p>\n<p>STRATEGIC PLAN: EPA must develop a strategic plan for drinking water research and transmit   this plan to Congress   and the public for review (no deadlines included for completing the plan).   Title II&#8211;Sec. 202]<\/p>\n<p>KERR LAB: EPA is allowed to re-establish a partnership between the Kerr Environmental   Research Lab and the   National Center for Ground Water Research to conduct research, training, and technology   transfer for ground water   quality (no funds are authorized for this activity).  Title II&#8211;Sec. 203<br \/>\n<a name=\"3E\"><\/p>\n<h3>SMALL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VARIANCES, AND   EXEMPTIONS<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><br \/>\nAFFORDABLE TECHNOLOGIES: When promulgating new national primary drinking water   regulations, EPA is to   identify technologies that are affordable and which achieve compliance for categories of systems   serving fewer than   10,000.  Technologies may include packaged or modular systems and point-of-use (POU)\/   point-of-entry (POE) units   under the control of the water system (no POU for microbial contaminants). [1412(b)(4)(E)] Sec.   105<\/p>\n<p>SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE (SWTR):   EPA must within 1 year list small system   technologies that meet the   SWTR.   Within 2 years, EPA (in consultation with the States) must list technologies that achieve   compliance with all    existing regulations. [1412(b)(4)(E)] Sec. 105<\/p>\n<p>VARIANCE TECHNOLOGY: Whenever an affordable technology cannot be identified that   meets an MCL, EPA is   required to identify &#8220;variance technologies&#8221; that are affordable, but do not necessarily meet the   MCL.  Such   technologies shall &#8220;achieve the maximum reduction or inactivation efficiency that is affordable   considering the size of   the system and the quality of the source water.&#8221;  EPA is to issue guidance on variance   technologies for existing   regulations within 2 years. [1412(b)(15)] Sec.111(a)<\/p>\n<p>SMALL SYSTEM VARIANCES: States are authorized to grant variances from standards for   systems serving up to 3,300   people if the system cannot afford to comply (through treatment, an alternative source, or   restructuring) and the system   installs the variance technology.  The terms of the variance must ensure adequate protection of   human health.  States   can grant variances to systems serving 3,300-10,000 people with EPA approval. [1415(e)] Sec.   116<\/p>\n<p>REGULATIONS FOR VARIANCES: Within 2 years, EPA, in consultation with the States, must   promulgate regulations for   variances.  Regulations must specify procedures to be used to grant or deny variances,   requirements for the installa-   tion and proper operation of variance technologies, eligibility criteria for a variance, and   information requirements for   variance applications. [1415(e)(7)] Sec. 116(a)<\/p>\n<p>BLOCK ON CERTAIN VARIANCES: Variances are not available for microbial contaminants or   for contaminants   regulated prior to 1986.  [1415(e)(6)] Sec. 116<\/p>\n<p>VARIANCE TIME FRAMES: A variance must require compliance with its conditions within 3   years of the date it is issued.    States may allow an additional 2 years when needed. [1415(e)(4)]  States must review variances   every 5 years following   the compliance date established in the variance.[1415(e)(5)] Sec. 116<\/p>\n<p>AFFORDABILITY CRITERIA: Within 18 months of enactment, EPA, in consultation with the   States and the Rural Utilities   Service of the Department of Agriculture, must publish information to assist States in developing   affordability criteria to   use in making variance determinations.  [1415(e)(7)(B)] Sec. 116<\/p>\n<p>CHANGE TO EXISTING VARIANCE PROCESS: The process for variances (retained from the   old law) is streamlined by   allowing a system to receive a variance &#8220;on the condition&#8221; that the system install the BAT, rather   than after the   installation of the technology, as previously required under SDWA.  (NOTE: This change applies   to ALL system sizes,   not just small systems.)  [1415(a)(1)(A)] Sec. 115<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF VARIANCES: EPA must review\/approve variances for systems serving   3,300-10,000 people.  EPA may   review and object to any proposed variance.  Consumers of water systems for which a State   proposes a variance may   petition EPA to object to a variance.  States must respond to EPA objections before granting a   variance.  [1415(e)(10)]   Sec. 116<\/p>\n<p>TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION: EPA may request information from manufacturers, States,   and other interested   persons on the effectiveness of commercially available treatment systems and technologies for the   purpose of   developing guidance or regulations related to small system technologies and variances. [1445(h)]   Sec. 111(b)<\/p>\n<p>EXEMPTIONS: In granting exemptions, a State may consider whether a community may be   defined as   &#8220;disadvantaged&#8221; for the purpose of receiving DWSRF funds, or whether DWSRF funds are   reasonably likely to be   received.  States must determine whether management or restructuring changes (or both) would   improve water quality   or achieve compliance before granting an exemption.  Schedules for compliance must include   &#8220;increments of   progress&#8221; (retained from old law) or &#8220;measures to develop an alternative source of water supply&#8221;   (new law).   A system   is not eligible for an exemption if the system receives a small system variance.  The period of an   exemption is   lengthened from 1 year (old law) to 3 years.  Eligibility for renewable exemptions  is expanded   from systems serving   fewer than 500 service connections (approximately 1500 persons) under the old law, to systems   serving fewer than   3,300 persons. Renewals are limited to a total of 6 years.  [1416] Sec. 117<br \/>\n<a name=\"3F\"><\/p>\n<h3>MONITORING<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>INFORMATION COLLECTION: Previous law is modified to clarify that EPA may collect   information from &#8220;every person   who is subject to any requirement of this title or who is a grantee.&#8221;  By regulation, EPA may   require information to assist   in developing standards, determining compliance, and evaluating health risk or advising the public   of risks.  EPA may   require information without rulemaking to determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether a person   has or is acting in   compliance.   EPA may also require information without rulemaking to assist in developing   standards, but EPA may not   require the installation of treatment, testing of technologies, or analysis of monitoring samples   unless EPA provides   funding. [1445(a)]  Sec. 125(a)<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: Within two years after enactment, EPA is   required to review the monitor-ing requirements for at least 12 contaminants and promulgate any   necessary modifications.  [1445(a)] Sec. 125(a)<\/p>\n<p>INTERIM MONITORING RELIEF: A State may modify the monitoring requirements for public   water systems serving   10,000 or fewer persons for any regulated or unregulated contaminant (except for microbial   contaminants, disinfection   byproducts, or corrosion byproducts) so that no further quarterly monitoring be required if initial   monitoring fails to   detect the presence of the contaminant, and the State determines that the contaminant is unlikely   to be detected by   further monitoring.  This monitoring relief will end when permanent monitoring relief is adopted   or 36 months after   enactment. [1418]  Sec. 125(b)<\/p>\n<p>PERMANENT ALTERNATIVE MONITORING: A State exercising primary enforcement   authority for public water systems   may adopt permanent alternative monitoring requirements in accordance with EPA guidelines, if   the State has an   approved source water assessment program.  The States alternative monitoring program must be   adequate to assure   compliance with, and enforcement of, applicable drinking water regulations.  The alternative   requirements may not   apply to regulated microbial contaminants or indicators thereof (e.g., Giardia, coliform),   disinfectants or disinfection   by-products, or corrosion by-products. [1418] Sec. 125(b)<\/p>\n<p>EPA GUIDANCE: EPA must issue guidelines for alternative monitoring requirements at the same   time as guidelines for   source water assessments (under section 1453).  EPA may also approve  alternative monitoring   requirements for   systems in a State that does not have primacy.   [1418] Sec. 125(b)<\/p>\n<p>UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING: EPA must issue regulations establishing   criteria for the monitoring of   unregulated contaminants.  Monitoring shall vary based on system size, source water, and   contaminants likely to be   found.  Only a representative sample of systems serving 10,000 persons or fewer must monitor.    EPA shall list for   unregulated contaminant monitoring no more than 30 contaminants within 3 years after   enactment, and every 5 years   thereafter.  Results of the monitoring are to be included in the national contaminant occurrence   data base.  [1445(a)]   Sec. 125(c)<\/p>\n<p>SMALL AND MEDIUM SYSTEM MONITORING PLAN: Each State may develop an   unregulated contaminant monitoring   plan for small and medium systems (serving fewer than 10,000).  EPA is required to cover the   reasonable costs of   testing and laboratory analysis for such plans, using funds authorized for unregulated contaminant   monitoring (see   below), or a $2 million DWSRF reservation.   EPA shall waive the requirement for monitoring of   unregulated   contaminants in a State if the State demonstrates that the criteria for monitoring are not applicable   in the State.    [1445(a)] Sec. 125(c)<\/p>\n<p>RESULTS REPORTING: Water systems must provide the results of unregulated contaminant   monitoring to the primacy   agency (State\/EPA) and must notify persons served by the system of the availability of results.   [1445(a)]Sec. 125(c)<\/p>\n<p>AUTHORIZATION: Congress authorizes $10,000,000 per year for FYs 1997-2003 to carry out   provisions for unregulated   contaminant monitoring. [1445(a)] Sec. 125(c)<\/p>\n<p>ANALYTICAL METHODS: EPA is required to review new methods for screening regulated   contaminants, and may   approve them, if they are more accurate or more cost-effective than established methods approved   for use in   compliance monitoring. [1445(i)] Sec. 125(d)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"3G\"><\/p>\n<h3>ENFORCEMENT<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS: The process for issuing administrative compliance orders is   streamlined by deleting the   requirement for EPA to issue a proposed order. [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>PENALTY CAP: The maximum administrative penalty for violating an administrative order is   raised from $5,000 to   $25,000. [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>PENALTY PROCESS: The process for assessing an administrative penalty of $5,000 or less is   streamlined by deleting   the requirement for a hearing in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act for these   penalties.  Requires a   hearing in accordance with APA procedures if the penalty sought is between $5,000 and $25,000.   [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>CONSOLIDATION INCENTIVE: A public water supply may submit a plan (with specific   measures and schedules) for   approval by EPA or a primary enforcement State for consolidation (physical or managerial) or   transfer of owner- ship.     If the plan is approved, no enforcement action shall be taken with respect to the specific violation   identified in the   approved plan prior to 2 years after plan approval or the date on which consolidation is   completed, whichever is first.   [1414(h)].  Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>ENFORCEABLE REQUIREMENTS: Defines provisions that are enforceable (&#8220;applicable   requirements of this title&#8221;).    Applicable requirements are defined as requirements of 1412, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1441, or   1445; regulations   promulgated pursuant to those sections; schedules or requirements imposed pursuant to those   sections; and   requirements of, or permits issued under a State program which satisfies the requirements of    section 1413 or is   otherwise approved by EPA. [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>NOTIFICATION OF LOCAL OFFICIALS: In nonprimacy states, EPA is required to notify an   appropriate locally elected   public official before proceeding with an enforcement action. [1414] Sec. 113(a)<\/p>\n<p>EMERGENCY AUTHORITY PENALTY: The penalty for violating an order issued under   Section 1431 (Emergency Powers)   is increased from $5,000 per day to $15,000 per day. [1414] Sec. 113(d)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"4\"><\/p>\n<h2>IV. FUNDING FOR STATES AND WATER SYSTEMS<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"4A\"><\/p>\n<h3>DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING   FUND<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>ESTABLISHMENT: EPA is required to enter into agreements with eligible States to make   capitalization grants to further   the health protection objectives of SDWA.  A total of $9.6 billion &#8212; $599 million in FY94 and   $1.0 billion annually &#8212; is   authorized in FY&#8217;s 95-2003.  To be eligible to receive a grant, a State must establish a drinking   water treatment   revolving loan fund and comply with other requirements of the DWSRF section. [1452(a),(m)]   Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>ALLOTMENT AND ELIGIBILITY: Through fiscal year 1997, funds will be allotted by the   formula used to distribute federal   grants to States for drinking water program implementation (&#8220;public water supply supervision   program&#8221;).  A minimum   grant amount of 1% will be available for all States, including Wyoming and DC.  Up to 0.33% is   available for allotment to   other specified areas (Virgin Islands, Guam, et. al.). Funds for FY98 and beyond will be allotted   based on the results of   the most recent Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) needs survey.  Eligible systems   are community water   systems and non-profit non-community water systems.  No loans can be made to Federal systems.   [1452(a),(i)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>LINK TO PRIMACY: States that lose primacy in the future, except for Wyoming, will not be   eligible for DWSRF grants.   [1452(a)(1)(F)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>LINK TO CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT: EPA is required to withhold DWSRF funds from   States that do not set up capacity   development programs (20% of DWSRF grant starting in FY99 for new system authority; and   10% in 2001,15% in 2002,   and 20% in 2003 for capacity development strategies).  Withholding for all capacity development   purposes is capped at   20% total. [1452(a)(1)(G)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>LINK TO OPERATOR CERTIFICATION: EPA is required to withhold 20% of DWSRF funds   if a State does not meet the   requirement for operator certification programs. [1452(a)(1)(G)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>USE OF FUNDS: DWSRF funds can be used for loans, loan guarantees, source of reserve and   security for leveraged   loans (proceeds of which are placed in the DWSRF), and other uses as allowed in the Act.  Funds   may be used by a   public water system only to &#8220;facilitate compliance with national primary drinking water   regulations&#8221; and &#8220;significantly   further the health protection objectives of this title.&#8221;  Small systems (fewer than 10,000 persons)   are to receive 15% of   annual assistance from a State&#8217;s DWSRF, to the extent such funds can be obligated for eligible   projects.  Disadvan-   taged systems may receive loan subsidies (including forgiveness of principal) up to 30% of a   State&#8217;s DWSRF annual   assistance. [1452(a)(2)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>INTENDED USE PLANS:  States must annually prepare, after providing for public review and   comment, an Intended   Use Plan that identifies how the DWSRF funds will be used.  States must give highest priority to   projects that address   the most serious risks to public health, are necessary to achieve compliance, and assist systems   most in need on a per   household basis.  Types of assistance which may be made using State loan funds are specifically   defined.  [1452(b),   1452(f)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>STATE MATCH: States must contribute an amount equal to 20% of the total federal   contribution.  State funds must be   received on or before the date federal funds are received, except that States may delay the deposit   of funds until no   later than September 30, 1999 for grant payments made for fiscal years 1994-1997. [1452(e)]   Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>SET-ASIDES: (Prior to allotment to States)  $10,000,000 per year is reserved for health effects   research and, starting in   FY 1998, $2,000,000 per year for unregulated contaminant monitoring.  An amount up to 2% of   the funds appropriated   may be reserved by EPA for technical assistance, and may be used to supplement fund-ing for   technical assistance   under Section 1442(e).   EPA may use up to 1.5% of funds for grants to Indian Tribes and Alaska   Native Villages for   public water systems.  Funds must also be reserved for operator training cost reimbursement if   there is no separate   appropriation. [1452(i),(n),(o),(q); 1419(d)(4)] Sec 130, Sec 123<\/p>\n<p>OTHER USES OF FUNDS: (After allotment to States)  Up to 4% of State allotment may be   used by the State for   administration of the fund.  An additional 2% may be used for small system technical assistance.     Up to ten percent   may be used for a combination of the following: PWSS activities, State capacity development   strategies, operator   certification programs, and source water protection programs. [1452(g)] Sec. 130   Up to 15% may be used for a combination of the following: loans for the acquisition of land or   conservation easements,   loans to implement voluntary source water protection measures; technical and financial assistance   to water systems as   part of a State capacity development strategy; delineations\/assessments of source water protection   areas; and   establishment and implementation of wellhead protection programs.  No single item can receive   greater than 10%.   [1452(a)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>COMBINED FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION: Financial administration can be combined with   other funds, such as the   Clean Water Act DWSRF, as long as separate accounts are maintained.  The authority to establish   assistance priorities   and oversight responsibilities will be carried out by the primacy agency. [1452(g)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Anytime after one year after a State establishes a DWSRF, but prior to   fiscal year 2002, the   Governor of a State may transfer 33% of the funds in the Drinking Water DWSRF to the Clean   Water Act DWSRF.  The   same dollar amount may be transferred from the Clean Water Act DWSRF to the Drinking Water   DWSRF.   Within 4   years, EPA must submit a report to Congress regarding implementation of the transfer provisions.    [Free standing   provision &#8212; Title III, Sec. 302]<\/p>\n<p>REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE: EPA is required to publish DWSRF regulations and   guidance as necessary.  The   regulations and guidance will address how States commit and expend allotted funds, use funds   efficiently, prevent   waste, fraud and abuse, and avoid the use of funds for expansion of public water systems.    Guidance and regulations   must also ensure that States and public water systems use accounting, audit, and fiscal procedures   that conform to   generally accepted accounting standards. [1452(g)(3)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>AUDITS: States are required to publish and submit to EPA a report every 2 years that describes   program activities and   expenditures and includes the most recent audit of the State&#8217;s program. [1452(g)(4)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>NEEDS SURVEY: EPA is required to perform an assessment of the capital improvement needs   of all eligible public   water systems, including Native American systems, and submit a report within 180 days of   passage of the Act.  Addi-   tional surveys will be conducted every 4 years thereafter. [1452(h)] Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p>WATER CONSERVATION: Within two years of enactment of the 1996 amendments to the   SDWA, EPA must publish   guidelines for water conservation plans.  Within a year of publication of the guidelines, a State   may, as a condition of   receiving a DWSRF loan, require a water system to submit a water conservation plan.   [1455(a),(b)] Sec. 134<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"5\"><\/p>\n<h2>V. OTHER PROVISIONS<\/h2>\n<p><\/a> <a name=\"5A\"><\/p>\n<h3>PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SUPERVISION<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>TIME FRAME FOR STATE PRIMACY: In order to maintain primary enforcement responsibility   for regulations   promulgated under the SDWA, States must adopt regulations that are no less stringent than   federal regulations within 2   years of the date of promulgation of the federal regulations.  EPA may grant an extension of 2   additional years if EPA   determines that the extension is necessary and justified. [1413(a)(1)] Sec. 112(a)<\/p>\n<p>ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY REQUIREMENT FOR PRIMACY: As a condition of primacy,   States must have the authority   for administrative penalties.  Specifically, for systems serving more than 10,000 persons,  States   must be able to assess   not less than $1,000 per day per violation.  For smaller systems, States must have authority which   is adequate to ensure   compliance.  The State may establish a maximum amount of administrative penalties which may   be imposed on a   public water system. [1413(a)]  Sec. 113(b)<\/p>\n<p>INTERIM PRIMACY: States with up-to-date primacy programs are considered to have interim   primacy for new   regulations promulgated by EPA beginning on the effective date of the State regulations adopted   and submitted by the   State, and ending at such time as EPA disapproves a State program. [Section 1413(c)] Sec.   112(a)<\/p>\n<p>PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISION GRANT:  The authorization for carrying out State   Public Water System   Supervision Programs (PWSS) is increased to $100 million for each of fiscal years 1997-2003.    [1443(a)] Sec. 124<\/p>\n<p>EPA PRIMACY: EPA is given authority to use funds from a State&#8217;s portion of the Public Water   System Supervision   Program grant to implement the program where the State does not have primary enforcement   responsibility (primacy).    EPA may cover a shortfall in funds by using a portion of a State&#8217;s DWSRF allocation to carry out   primary enforcement   authority.  If such funds are used, EPA must carry out all activities required of a State.  [1443(a)]   Sec. 124, [1452(a)(1)(F)]   Sec. 130<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"5B\"><\/p>\n<h3>FEDERAL AGENCIES<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: Contains a clear waiver of sovereign immunity for federal agencies   with respect to all federal,   State and local requirements.   Provides EPA with authority to issue an administrative penalty   order if EPA finds that a   federal agency has violated an applicable requirement of this title.  The penalty may not exceed   $25,000 per day per   violation.  Funds collected by a State from the federal government in fines or penalties must be   used by the State for   projects designed to improve or protect the environment or defray the costs of environmental   protection or enforcement.   [1447] Sec. 129(a)<\/p>\n<p>REVIEW OF ORDERS: Any interested party may obtain review in US District Court of an   administrative penalty order   issued by EPA to a federal agency. [1447] Sec. 129(a)<\/p>\n<p>CITIZEN ACTION: A citizen may bring an action for the collection of a penalty against a federal   agency that fails to pay   a penalty by the date which is 18 months after the effective date of the final order.  The citizen is   required to notify the   Attorney General and the affected federal agency 60 days before the suit is filed.   [1447] Sec.   129(b)<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"5C\"><\/p>\n<h3>MISCELLANEOUS<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>LEAD LEACHING STANDARD: If a voluntary standard for the leaching of lead from new   plumbing fittings and fixtures is   not established within one year of the effective date of the Act, then EPA must promulgate   regulations setting a   performance based standard for lead leaching levels from such components. (Note: A voluntary   standard is now in   place.) [1417]  Sec. 118<\/p>\n<p>LEAD PROHIBITION: Two years after enactment, it becomes illegal for any pipe or  plumbing   fixture that is not lead-free   to be introduced into commerce.  The exception is pipes used in manufacturing or industrial   processing.  It will also be   illegal, two years after enactment, to sell solder or flux that is not lead-free.  Solder that is not   lead-free may be sold if  it   bears a prominent label stating that it is illegal to use it in the installation or repair of plumbing   providing water for   human consumption. [1417] Sec. 118<\/p>\n<p>LIMITED ALTERNATIVE TO FILTRATION: States may allow unfiltered water systems with   surface water sources to use   treatment other than filtration.  In order to qualify for alternative treatment,  a water system  must   have an uninhabited,   undeveloped watershed in consolidated ownership and have control over access to and activities   in the watershed.    The alternative treatment must ensure greater removal or inactivation efficiencies of pathogenic   organisms than would   be achieved by the combination of filtration and chlorine disinfection required by section 1412   (b)(7)(C). [1412(b)(7)(C)]   Sec. 106<\/p>\n<p>GRANTS FOR ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGES: The Administrator is authorized to make grants   to the State of  Alaska to   pay 50 percent of the cost of improving sanitation for rural and Alaska Native villages.  Grants   will be for development   and construction of  public water and wastewater systems and also for training, technical   assistance, and educational   programs.  The State may use up to 4 percent of the amount of the grant for related   administrative expenses.  EPA is   required to consult with the State of Alaska to prioritize the needs of individual villages.    Authorization for this provision   is at $15,000,000 for each FY&#8217;97-2000. Title III&#8211;Sec.  303<\/p>\n<p>RELATIONSHIP OF GRANTS TO DWSRF FUND: A &#8220;Sense of the Congress&#8221;  states that   appropriations for grants   should not be provided for watershed protection in New York City&#8217;s watersheds, sanitation   improvements at colonias, or   sanitation improvements for Alaska Native Villages if such appropriations would prevent   adequate funding for state   revolving loan funds. Title III&#8211;Sec 304<\/p>\n<p>WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT: Congress grants consent for the District of Columbia, Arlington   County, VA and the city of   Falls Church to establish an entity to operate, maintain and manage the Washington Aqueduct.    The Secretary of the   Army is required to develop a plan, within 1 year, for the transfer of the Washington Aqueduct to   a non-Federal entity.    The Corps of Engineers is authorized to borrow up to $29 million in 1997, 424 million for 1998,   and $22 million for 1999 to   carry out capital improvements until the time of transfer.  ( Title III&#8211;Sec. 304.)  The Secretary of   the Army may not pass   on the costs of an enforcement penalty to the customers of the Washington Aqueduct system.   [1447]  Sec.129(c)<\/p>\n<p>DRINKING WATER FUNDS FOR COLONIAS: EPA and other appropriate Federal agencies   are authorized to award   grants to Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas, to provide assistance  (up to 50% of   project costs) to colonias   where the residents are subject to a significant health risk attributable to the lack of access to an   adequate and   affordable drinking water system.   Appropriations of $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years   1997 through 1999 is   authorized. [1456] Sec. 135<\/p>\n<p>WASTEWATER FUNDS FOR COLONIAS: The Administrator is authorized to make grants for   planning, design,   construction, or improvement of  sewers, treatment works, and appropriate connections for   wastewater treatment for   colonias.  Grants cannot exceed 50 percent of the cost of carrying out any project.  $25 million is   authorized for this   provision in fiscal years 1997 through 1999.  Title III&#8211;Sec. 307<\/p>\n<p>ZEBRA MUSSEL CONTROL: The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control   Act of 1990 is amended to   include Lake Champlain at 16 U.S.C. 4701(a).  Provision references zebra mussel control in Lake   Champlain.  Title III&#8211;Sec. 308<\/p>\n<p>DEFINITIONAL CHANGE FOR ANALYTIC METHODS:  Modifies the pre-existing   requirement that national primary   drinking water regulations (NPDWR) contain quality control and testing procedures for   compliance purposes to now   require &#8220;accepted methods for&#8221; quality control and testing procedures.   After the promulgation of   a NPDWR, EPA is   allowed to &#8220;add equally effective&#8221; quality control and testing procedures through guidance   published in the Federal   Register. [1401]  Sec. 101(a)<\/p>\n<p>DEFINITION OF COMMUNITY\/NONCOMMUNITY SYSTEM: &#8220;Community water system&#8221; is   defined as a public water   system that has at least 15 service connections or serves 25 persons year-round.   &#8220;Noncommunity   water system&#8221; is   defined as a public water system that is not a community water system. [1401] Sec. 101(a)<\/p>\n<p>OPEN CONVEYANCES: The general definition of &#8220;public water system&#8221; (PWS) is broadened   from water systems that   deliver water through pipes to include systems that use &#8220;construct-ed conveyances.&#8221;  However,   certain connections   that might otherwise qualify a system as a public water system under the broadened definition are   excluded from   consideration where: the water is not used for &#8220;residential uses&#8221;;  alternative water is provided for   drinking and cooking;   or water for drinking, cooking, and bathing is treated (centrally or by point of entry).  Alternative   or treated water must   provide a level of health protection equivalent to the applicable standard(s).  A transition period   of 2 years is provided   for compliance. [1401]  Sec. 101(b)<\/p>\n<p>RETURN FLOW: Repeals Section 3013 of PL 102-486 (Energy Act).  Deletes Energy Act   provision which encourages the   use of heat exchange units.  Title III<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"5D\"><\/p>\n<h3>ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR WATER   INFRASTRUCTURE AND WATERSHEDS<br \/>\n(Title IV&#8211;does not amend the SDWA)<\/h3>\n<p><\/a>GRANT AUTHORITY: EPA may provide technical and financial assistance in the form of grants   to States for water   supply improvements and for source water quality programs consistent with Section 319 of the   Clean Water Act (to   address contaminants for the purpose of making supplies usable for water systems).  Not more   than 30% of funds   appropriated may be used for Section 319 activities.  Title IV<\/p>\n<p>USE OF GRANTS: As a condition for receiving a grant, a State must ensure that assistance will   be used in the most   cost-effective manner.  The Federal share of activities funded with grants shall be 50 percent. Title   IV<\/p>\n<p>FUNDING LEVELS: Annual funding of $25 million is authorized for grants for fiscal years   1997-2003.  An additional $25   million is authorized for each fiscal year 1997-2003 if the appropriations for the Drinking Water   DWSRF exceed 75% of   the authorized level ($1 billion is authorized for the DWSRF).  Title IV<br \/>\n<!-- #EndEditable --> <!-- END CONTENT AREA --><\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"95%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"4\" valign=\"top\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/images\/epafiles_misc_space.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" hspace=\"69\" vspace=\"2\" width=\"2\" height=\"1\" \/><\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"4\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/images\/epafiles_misc_space.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"5\" height=\"5\" \/><\/td>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><!-- BEGIN AREA FOOTER --> <!-- ADD LINKS AND TEXT FOR AREA FOOTER WITHIN THIS PARAGRAPH TAG --><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/index.html\">Safewater Home<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/about.html\">About Our Office<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pubs\/index.html\">Publications<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/links.html\">Links<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/water\/index.html\">Office of Water<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/agua.html\">En Espa\u00f1ol<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/drinklink.html\">Contact Us<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/new.html\">What&#8217;s New <\/a><\/p>\n<p><!-- END AREA FOOTER --> <!-- END AREA FOOTER --><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><!-- BEGIN FOOTER IMAGE --> <img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/images\/epafiles_misc_dot_dkblue.gif\" alt=\"Begin Site Footer\" vspace=\"2\" width=\"460\" height=\"4\" \/> <!-- END FOOTER IMAGE --><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><!-- BEGIN GLOBAL FOOTER --><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/\">EPA Home<\/a> |  \t\t\t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/usenotice.htm\">Privacy and Security Notice<\/a> |   <!-- BEGIN AREA COMMENTS LINK --> <!-- CHANGE THIS URL TO POINT TO CONTACTS PAGE FOR THIS AREA --> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/water\/comments.html\">Contact Us<\/a> <!-- END AREA COMMENTS LINK --><\/p>\n<p><script src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/scripts\/dateurl.js\">\n\t\t\t<\/script>Last updated on Tuesday, March 17th, 2009<br \/>\nURL: http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/summ.html<\/p>\n<p><!-- END GLOBAL FOOTER --><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h1>Standards and Risk Management<!-- #EndEditable --><\/h1>\n<p><!-- END PAGE NAME --> <!-- BEGIN CONTENT AREA --> <!-- #BeginEditable \"content\" --><\/p>\n<div>\n<h5>Drinking Water Links<\/h5>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/safewater.custhelp.com\/cgi-bin\/safewater.cfg\/php\/enduser\/std_alp.php?p_sid=VTDB3eMj\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/consumerinformation\/_images\/whataboutdrinkingwater.jpg\" alt=\"Have questions about Drinking Water?\" width=\"188\" height=\"62\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html\">A to Z Topics<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/about.html\">About Our Office<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/drinklink.html\">Contact Us<\/a><\/div>\n<p>The Environmental Protection Agency sets standards that, when combined with protecting ground water and surface water, are a critical to ensuring safe drinking water. EPA works with its regional offices, states, tribes and its many partners to protect public health through implementing the Safe Drinking Water Act.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/current_regs.html\"> Current Drinking Water Regulations:<\/a> Provides information on regulations on contaminants EPA regulates in drinking water.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/regs_under_development.html\">Regulations under Development<\/a>: Focuses on the current regulatory status of certain contaminants and public water system operations.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/other_actions.html\"> Other Actions:<\/a> describes other activities EPA has taken in response to the 1996 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/contaminants\/index.html\">Basic Information about Drinking Water Contaminants<\/a>: provides definitions of National Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations and fact sheets on the contaminants EPA regulates in drinking water.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/standard\/setting.html\">Regulating Contaminants in Drinking Water<\/a>: Describes how EPA decides which contaminants to regulate, how drinking water standards are set, and when to revise existing regulations.<\/li>\n<p><!--\n\t\n\n<li>Economics and Regulatory Development:<\/li>\n\n\n--><\/p>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/about.html#Standards%20and%20Risk%20Management%20Division\">About the Standards and Risk Management Division<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- #EndEditable --> <!-- BEGIN AREA FOOTER --> <!-- ADD TEXT\/LINKS FOR AREA FOOTER WITHIN THIS PARAGRAPH TAG --><\/p>\n<p id=\"areafooter\"><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/index.html\">Safewater Home<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/about.html\">About Our Office<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pubs\/index.html\">Publications<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/safewater.custhelp.com\/cgi-bin\/safewater.cfg\/php\/enduser\/std_alp.php\">Questions and Answers<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/links.html\">Links<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/water\/index.html\">Office of Water<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/agua.html\">En Espa\u00f1ol<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><!-- END AREA FOOTER --> <!-- END CONTENT --> <\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<div id=\"area-nav\"><!-- BEGIN LEFT SIDEBAR NAVIGATION --><\/p>\n<h3>Local Navigation<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/dwhealth.html\">Drinking Water and Health Basics<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/faq\/faq.html\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/dwinfo.htm\">Local Drinking Water Information<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/standards.html\">Drinking Water Standards<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/contaminants\/index.html\">List of Contaminants &amp; MCLs<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/regs.html\">Regulations &amp; Guidance<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pws\/pwss.html\">Public Drinking Water Systems<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cfpub.epa.gov\/safewater\/sourcewater\/\">Source Water Protection<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/uic.html\">Underground Injection Control<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/databases.html\">Data &amp; Databases<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/dwa.html\">Drinking Water Academy<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/sdwa.html\">Safe Drinking Water Act<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/ndwac\/council.html\">National Drinking Water Advisory Council<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cfpub.epa.gov\/safewater\/watersecurity\/index.cfm\">Water Infrastructure Security<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/kids\/index.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/images\/drinkingwater4kids_icon.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"70\" \/><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- END LEFT SIDEBAR NAVIGATION --> <\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h1>Ground Water          &amp; Drinking Water Topics<!-- #EndEditable --><\/h1>\n<p><!-- END PAGE NAME --> <!-- BEGIN CONTENT AREA --> <!-- #BeginEditable \"content\" --><\/p>\n<div>\n<p><span><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html\">A<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#blink\">B<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#clink\">C<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#dlink\">D<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#elink\">E<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#flink\">F<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#glink\">G<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#hlink\">H<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#ilink\">I<\/a><\/strong> | J | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#klink\">K<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#llink\">L<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#mlink\">M<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#nlink\">N<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#olink\">O<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#plink\">P<\/a><\/strong> | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#q\"><strong>Q<\/strong><\/a> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#rlink\">R<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#slink\">S<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#tlink\">T<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#ulink\">U<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#vlink\">V<\/a><\/strong> | <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html#wlink\">W<\/a><\/strong> | X | Y | Z<\/span><\/div>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<strong>A<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/airlinewater\/index.html\">Airlines<br \/>\n<\/a><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/methods\/methods.html\">Analytical Methods<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/cfpub.epa.gov\/compliance\/resources\/reports\/accomplishment\/sdwa\/\"> Annual Public Water System Compliance Report<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/arsenic.html\"><br \/>\nArsenic<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"blink\" name=\"blink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>B<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/faq\/faq.html#safe\">Boil Water Notice<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/faq\/faq.html#bw\"><br \/>\nBottled Water<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"clink\" name=\"clink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>C<\/strong><span><a href=\"http:\/\/yosemite.epa.gov\/water\/news.nsf\/ogwdwcalendar?OpenView&amp;Grid=4\"><br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/smallsystems\/index.html\">Capacity Development<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/chemicalcontaminantrules\/index.html\"><br \/>\nChemical Phase Rule<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/kids\/kidshealth\/index.html\"><br \/>\nChildren and Drinking Water Standards<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/cfpub.epa.gov\/safewater\/sourcewater\/sourcewater.cfm?action=Involvement&amp;view=general\"><br \/>\nCitizen&#8217;s Guide to Ground-Water Protection<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/uic\/wells_class1.html\">Class 1 Injection Wells<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/uic\/wells_class2.html\">Class 2 Injection Wells<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/uic\/wells_class3.html\">Class 3 Injection Wells<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/uic\/wells_class4.html\">Class 4 Injection Wells<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/uic\/class5\/basicinformation.html\">Class 5 Injection Wells<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/tcr\/index.html\"><br \/>\nColiform<br \/>\n<\/a><\/span><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/openc.html\">Comments<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pws\/factoids.html\">Community Water System<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/cwssvr.html\"><br \/>\nCommunity Water System Survey 2000<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/csgwppnp.html\"><br \/>\nComprehensive State Ground Water Protection Programs<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/consumerinformation\/index.html\">Consumer Information<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/ccr1.html\">Consumer Confidence Report Rule<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/waterscience\/drinking\/percapita\/\"><br \/>\nConsumption<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/ccl\/index.html\">Contaminant Candidate List<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pdfs\/factsheets\/ioc\/copper.pdf\"><br \/>\nCopper<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/crossconnectioncontrol\/index.html\">Cross-connection Control<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/consumer\/pdf\/crypto.pdf\">Cryptosporidium<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/lt2\/lab_home.html\">Cryptosporidium Lab QA Evaluation Program<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"dlink\" name=\"dlink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>D<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/databases.html\">Databases<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/index.html\"><br \/>\nDisinfection Byproducts<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/tcr\/index.html#distribution\"><br \/>\nDistribution Systems<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/dwa.html\"><br \/>\nDrinking Water Academy<br \/>\n<\/a><\/span><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/drink\/index.html\">Drinking Water Research Information Network (DRINK)<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/mcl.html\"><br \/>\nDrinking Water Standards<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/dwsrf.html\"><br \/>\nDrinking Water State Revolving Fund<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/dwstrategy.html\"><br \/>\nDrinking Water Strategy<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"elink\" name=\"elink\"> <\/a><br \/>\n<strong>E<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/contaminants\/ecoli.html\">E. Coli<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/economic.html\"><br \/>\nEconomics<br \/>\n<\/a><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/faq\/emerg.html\"><span>Emergency Disinfection of Drinking Water<\/span><\/a><span><a href=\"http:\/\/es.epa.gov\/oeca\/water\/\"><br \/>\nEnforcement<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/etv\/\"><br \/>\nEnvironmental Technology Verification Program<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/nrmrl\/wswrd\/dw\/epanet.html\">EPANET              software<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/agua.html\"><br \/>\nEspa\u00f1ol<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"flink\" name=\"flink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>F<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pws\/factoids.html\">Facts &amp; Figures<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/hfacts.html#Microbiological\">Fecal coliform<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/filterbackwash.html\">Filter Backwash Rule<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/foia.html\"> Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/faq\/faq.html\">Frequent Questions<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/funding\/index.html\">Funding<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"glink\" name=\"glink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>G<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/glossary.htm\">Glossary          &#8211; Drinking Water Glossary<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/protect.html\"><br \/>\nGround Water<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/gwr\/index.html\">Ground Water Rule<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"hlink\" name=\"hlink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>H<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/dwh\/health.html\">Health          Effects<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/waterscience\/drinking\/standards\"><br \/>\nHealth        Advisories<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/uic\/wells_hydrofrac.html\"><br \/>\nHydraulic Fracturing<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"ilink\" name=\"ilink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>I<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/tribal.html\">Indian          Tribes<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/icr.html\"><br \/>\nInformation Collection Rule<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/mdbp\/mdbp.html#ieswtr\"><br \/>\nInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"klink\" name=\"klink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>K<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/kids\/index.html\">Kids<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"llink\" name=\"llink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>L<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/lt2\/cla_final.html\">Lab QA Evaluation Program for Cryptosporidium<br \/>\n<\/a><\/span><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/labcert\/index.html\">Laboratory Certification<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/lead\/leadfactsheet.html\"><br \/>\nLead<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/lcrmr\/index.html\">Lead and Copper Rule Revisions<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/lead\/index.html\"><br \/>\nLead in Drinking Water<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/lt2\/index.html\">Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"mlink\" name=\"mlink\"> <\/a><br \/>\n<strong>M<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/mcl.html\">Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/ndwacsum.html\"><br \/>\nMeeting Summaries<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/contaminants\/unregulated\/mtbe.html\"><br \/>\nMethyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MtBE)<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/index.html\"><br \/>\nMicrobials and Disinfection Byproducts<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/microbes\/\"><br \/>\nMicrobes<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pws\/labmon.html\"><br \/>\nMonitoring<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"nlink\" name=\"nlink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>N<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/data\/ncod\/index.html\">National Contaminant          Occurrence Database<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/ndwac\/council.html\"><br \/>\nNational Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC)<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/mcl.html\"><br \/>\nNational Primary Drinking Water Regulations<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/needs.html\"><br \/>\nNeeds Survey &#8211; Drinking Water Infrastructure<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/contaminants\/basicinformation\/nitrate.html\"><br \/>\nNitrate<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pws\/factoids.html\"><br \/>\nNon-Community Water System<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"olink\" name=\"olink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>O<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/ccl\/index.html\">Occurrence &amp; Contaminant          Selection<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/operatorcertification\/index.html\"><br \/>\nOperator Certification<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"plink\" name=\"plink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>P<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/psw\/psw.html\">Partnership for Safe Water<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/contaminants\/unregulated\/perchlorate.html\"><br \/>\nPerchlorate<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/esd\/chemistry\/pharma\/index.htm\"><br \/>\nPharmaceuticals<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/chemicalcontaminantrules\/index.html\"> Phase I Rule<br \/>\nPhase II Rule<br \/>\nPhase V Rule<\/a><\/span><span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pws\/primacy.htm\"><br \/>\nPrimacy State<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pubinput.html\"><br \/>\nPublic Input<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pn.html\"><br \/>\nPublic Notification Rule<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/ccr\/psa\/index.html\"><br \/>\nPublic Service Announcements<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pws\/pwsdef2.htm\"><br \/>\nPublic Water System (PWS)<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pubs\/index.html\"><br \/>\nPublications<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><a id=\"q\" name=\"q\"><\/a><br \/>\nQ<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/publicoutreach\/quickreferenceguides.html\">Quick Reference Guides<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"rlink\" name=\"rlink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>R<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/radon.html\">Radon in Drinking Water<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/radionuclides\/index.html\"><br \/>\nRadionuclides<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/protect.html\"><br \/>\nRaw Water<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/links-r.html\"><br \/>\nRegional EPA Offices<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/regs.html\"><br \/>\nRegulations<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/ncea\/drinking.htm\">Research (Risk assessment)<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/ord\/NRMRL\/wswrd\/\"><br \/>\nResearch (Water Supply &amp; Water Resources)<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"slink\" name=\"slink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>S<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/sdwa\/sdwa.html\">Safe Drinking Water Act<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/databases.html\">Safe Drinking Water Information Systems (SDWIS)<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/schools\/index.html\">Schools and Child Care Facilities<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/mcl.html\">Secondary Drinking Water Standards<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/review.html\">Six Year Review of Drinking Water Standards<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/smallsystems\/index.html\">Small Systems<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/contaminants\/unregulated\/sodium.html\">Sodium<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/cfpub.epa.gov\/safewater\/sourcewater\/sourcewater.cfm?action=SSA\"><br \/>\nSole Source          Aquifer<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/protect.html\">Source Water<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/cfpub.epa.gov\/safewater\/sourcewater\/sourcewater.cfm?action=Assessments&amp;view=general\">Source Water Assessment and Protection Programs<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/stage2\/index.html\">Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/protect\/swap.html\"> <\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/agua.html\"><br \/>\nSpanish<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/standards.html\"> Standards-setting Program<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/dwinfo.htm\">States<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/contaminants\/unregulated\/sulfate.html\"><br \/>\nSulfate<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/surf\/\"><br \/>\nSurf Your Watershed<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/tcr\/index.html#Surface\">Surface Water Treatment Rule<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"tlink\" name=\"tlink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>T<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/disinfection\/tcr\/index.html#Total\">Total Coliform Rule<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/treat.html\">Treatment Technology<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/dwa.html\">Training<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/tribal.html\"> Tribal<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"ulink\" name=\"ulink\"> <\/a><br \/>\n<strong>U<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/uic\/index.html\">Underground Injection Control          Program<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/ucmr\/index.html\">Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Program (UCMP) <\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/water.usgs.gov\/watuse\"> Usage<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"vlink\" name=\"vlink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>V<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pws\/pwss.html#variance\">Variance<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a id=\"wlink\" name=\"wlink\"><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>W<\/strong><br \/>\n<span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/owm\/water-efficiency\/index.htm\">Water          Conservation<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/rescnter.html\">Water Resource Center<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/wot\/index.html\">Water on Tap: What You Need to Know<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/wsg.html\">Water Supply Guidance<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/privatewells\/index.html\"> Wells (Private Drinking Water Wells)<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/cfpub.epa.gov\/safewater\/sourcewater\/sourcewater.cfm?action=Programs#wellhead\"> Wellhead Protection<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><!-- #EndEditable --> <!-- END CONTENT AREA --><\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"95%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"4\" valign=\"top\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/images\/epafiles_misc_space.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" hspace=\"69\" vspace=\"2\" width=\"2\" height=\"1\" \/><\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"4\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/images\/epafiles_misc_space.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"5\" height=\"5\" \/><\/td>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><!-- BEGIN AREA FOOTER --> <!-- ADD LINKS AND TEXT FOR AREA FOOTER WITHIN THIS PARAGRAPH TAG --><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/index.html\">Safewater Home<\/a> |   \t  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/about.html\">About Our Office<\/a> |   \t  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/pubs\/index.html\">Publications<\/a> |   \t  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/links.html\">Links<\/a> |   \t  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/water\/index.html\">Office of Water<\/a> |   \t  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/agua.html\">En Espa\u00f1ol<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/safewater.custhelp.com\/cgi-bin\/safewater.cfg\/php\/enduser\/std_alp.php\">Questions and Answers<\/a><\/p>\n<p><!-- END AREA FOOTER --><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><!-- BEGIN FOOTER IMAGE --> <img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/images\/epafiles_misc_dot_dkblue.gif\" alt=\"Begin Site Footer\" vspace=\"2\" width=\"460\" height=\"4\" \/> <!-- END FOOTER IMAGE --><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"100%\" align=\"center\" valign=\"top\"><!-- BEGIN GLOBAL FOOTER --><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/\">EPA Home<\/a> |   \t\t\t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/usenotice.htm\">Privacy and Security Notice<\/a> |     <!-- BEGIN AREA COMMENTS LINK --> <!-- CHANGE THIS URL TO POINT TO CONTACTS PAGE FOR THIS AREA --> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/drinklink.html\">Contact Us<\/a> <!-- END AREA COMMENTS LINK --><\/p>\n<p><script src=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epafiles\/scripts\/dateurl.js\" type=\"text\/javascript\"><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t<\/script>Last updated on Thursday, July 1st, 2010<br \/>\nURL: http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/safewater\/topics.html<\/p>\n<p><!-- END GLOBAL FOOTER --><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Safe Drinking Water Act FREE ESTIMATES Jacksonville\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Duval County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-346-1266 St Augustine\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 St Johns County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-824-7144 Orange Park\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Clay County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-264-6444 Jacksonville Beaches\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Duval County\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0904-246-3969 Fernandina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nassau County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-277-3040 Macclenny\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Baker County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-259-5091 Palm Coast\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Flagler County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 386-439-5290 Daytona\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Volusia County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 386-253-4911 GAINESVILLE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 ALACHUA COUNTY\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 352-335-8555 Serving all of Florida \u00a0and Georgia\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 at \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0904-346-1266 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/258"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=258"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/258\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":259,"href":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/258\/revisions\/259"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/asapgeneralcontracting.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}