DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR<\/p>\n
FREE ESTIMATES<\/p>\n
Jacksonville\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Duval County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-346-1266
\nSt Augustine\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 St Johns County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-824-7144
\nOrange Park\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Clay County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-264-6444
\nJacksonville Beaches\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Duval County\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0904-246-3969
\nFernandina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nassau County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-277-3040
\nMacclenny\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Baker County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-259-5091
\nPalm Coast\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Flagler County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 386-439-5290
\nDaytona\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Volusia County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 386-253-4911<\/p>\n
GAINESVILLE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 ALACHUA COUNTY\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 352-335-8555
\nServing all of Florida \u00a0and Georgia\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 at \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0904-346-1266<\/p>\n
EMAIL <\/strong>LARRY@1STPROP.COM<\/a> (feel free to email your bidding packages here)<\/p>\n DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS, HOUSES, MOBILE HOMES, CONCRETE SLABS, MULTI STORY BUILDINGS.<\/p>\n WE ALSO SPECIALIZE IN REMOVING CELL TOWERS, RADIO TOWERS.<\/p>\n WE RECYCLE ASPHAULT.<\/p>\n WE CAN CUT IT UP AND HAUL YOUR ASPHAULT AND CONCRETE AWAY.<\/p>\n What is construction and demolition debris? FREE ESTIMATES<\/p>\n Jacksonville\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Duval County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-346-1266 GAINESVILLE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 ALACHUA COUNTY\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 352-335-8555 EMAIL <\/strong>LARRY@1STPROP.COM<\/a> (feel free to email your bidding packages here)<\/p>\n other websites we recommend you look at<\/strong><\/p>\n www.asap-plumbing.com<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n www.asapgasinstallers.com<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n www.dirtandsandforsale.com<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n www.asaproofinspections.com<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/allprogas.com\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/asapbackflowtesting.com\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n
\nConstruction and demolition (C&D) debris is produced during new construction, renovation,
\nand demolition of buildings and structures. C&D debris includes bricks, concrete, masonry, soil,
\nrocks, lumber, paving materials, shingles, glass, plastics, aluminum (including siding), steel, drywall,
\ninsulation, asphalt roofing materials, electrical materials, plumbing fixtures, vinyl siding, corrugated
\ncardboard, and tree stumps. In 1996 the U.S. produced an estimated 136 million tons of buildingrelated
\nC&D debris.1 This estimate excludes road, bridge, and land-clearing materials, which can be
\na significant portion of total C&D materials discarded.
\nHow can C&D materials be recovered?
\nC&D materials can be recovered through reuse and recycling. In order for materials to be
\nreusable, contractors generally must remove them intact (windows and frames, plumbing
\nfixtures, floor and ceiling tiles) or in large pieces (drywall, lumber). Some materials may
\nrequire additional labor before they can be reused. For example, lumber may need to be
\ndenailed and window frames may need some new panes. In order to be recyclable,materials
\nmust be separated from contaminants (e.g., trash, nails, and broken glass). This can be
\naccomplished if contractors require workers to sort materials as they remove items from
\nbuildings or as debris is produced. Many contractors simply use labeled roll-off bins for
\nstorage of source-separated materials. For projects where on-site source separation is
\nnot possible, contractors often use C&D materials processing firms.
\nBenefits of recovering construction and demolition materials
\nn Reduces the environmental effects of extraction, transportation, and processing of
\nraw materials.
\nn Reduces project costs through avoided disposal costs, avoided purchases of new
\nmaterials, revenue earned from materials sales, and tax breaks gained for
\ndonations.
\nn Helps communities, contractors, and\/or building owners comply with state and
\nlocal policies, such as disposal bans and recycling goals.
\nn Enhances the public image of companies and organizations that reduce disposal.
\nn Conserves space in existing landfills.
\nBuilding Savings
\nStrategies for Waste Reduction of
\nConstruction and Demolition Debris
\nfrom Buildings
\nThe Waste Reduction Record-Setters Project fosters the
\ndevelopment of exceptional waste reduction programs by
\ndocumenting successful ones. These programs can be used as
\nmodels by others implementing their own programs to reduce
\ndisposal. This fact sheet packet is aimed at local governments
\nthat want to encourage more building-related construction and
\ndemolition debris recovery, building owners and developers interested in green
\nbuilding design, and building contractors seeking a competitive edge.
\nUnited States
\nEnvironmental Protection
\nAgency
\nSolid Waste and
\nEmergency Response
\n(5306W)
\nEPA-530-F-00-001
\nJune 2000
\nwww.epa.gov\/osw
\n40%
\n50%
\n60%
\n70%
\n80%
\n90%
\nThe choice of what and how
\nconstruction and demolition materials
\ncan be recovered depends on many factors
\nincluding the type of project, space on the
\nbuilding site, the existence of markets for
\nmaterials, the cost-effectiveness of
\nrecovery, the time allowed for the project,
\nand the experience of the contractors.
\nMany C&D materials can be reused or
\nrecycled.
\nType of project: Demolition projects
\nproduce much more debris than
\nrenovation or new construction for
\nsimilar sized structures. Wood is a
\nprimary component of most residential
\nstructures, whereas, steel and concrete
\nare often a primary component of
\ncommercial structures. Packaging
\nmaterials can often be a
\nsignificant portion of the debris
\nproduced during renovation
\nand new construction
\nprojects.
\nSpace on the building site:
\nMaterials recovery is often easiest if the
\nbuilding site is spacious enough to allow
\non-site sorting of materials. Having
\nseparate containers for each type of
\nmaterials can reduce contamination.
\nMaterials markets: Contractors can
\nmaximize recovery by taking advantage
\nof all available markets for recovered
\nmaterials. In some areas of the country,
\nspecialty hauling firms serving the
\nbuilding industries have emerged. These
\nfirms keep abreast of local markets and
\ncan advise clients which materials have
\nstrong local markets.
\nCost-effectiveness: Hauling and
\ndisposal costs, the value of
\nrecovered materials, and labor costs
\ncontribute to whether materials recovery
\nis more or less cost-effective than
\ndisposing of materials. Recovery of lowvalue
\nmaterials may be cost-effective if
\ndisposal costs are high and removal and
\nsorting are not labor-intensive. The
\nadded labor necessary to remove items
\nfor reuse may be offset by savings from
\nboth the avoided costs of purchasing
\nnew materials and avoided disposal
\ncosts.
\nProject timeline: Source separation of
\nmaterials for reuse and recycling can
\ntake more time than disposing of all
\ncommingled materials and often projects
\nare on a tight schedule due to financing
\narrangements. Contractors can maximize
\nmaterials recovery in the time allowed by
\nplanning ahead. If necessary, contractors
\ncan focus waste reduction efforts on offsite
\nsource separation and recycling.
\nContractor experience: Contractors wellversed
\nin recovery methods and local
\nmarkets may be able to recover more
\nmaterials than contractors unfamiliar
\nwith reuse and
\nrecovery techniques.
\nThe need for project
\ncoordinator
\noversight and
\neducational efforts
\ncan be lessened
\nwhen using a
\ncontractor
\nexperienced in C&D
\nrecovery efforts.
\nReuse
\nMany materials can be salvaged from
\ndemolition and renovation sites and sold,
\ndonated, stored for later use, or
\nreused on the current
\nproject. More than 200 used
\nbuilding materials stores
\naround the country buy and\/or accept
\ndonations of used building materials.
\nContractors can avoid the cost of removal
\nby allowing private companies to salvage
\nmaterials from the site. Organizations that
\nhave space may want to consider storing
\nhigh-value materials for later projects.
\nMany building materials may be reusable
\nduring renovation projects and projects
\nwhere a new building is built following the
\ndemolition of another. Planners can
\nincrease reuse potential by making efforts
\nto use the same size and types of materials
\nas in the old construction. Inadequate
\nstorage space for materials during the
\ninterim from removal to reinstallation may
\nlimit reuse as a materials recovery option.
\nTypical materials suitable for reuse include
\nplumbing fixtures, doors, cabinets,
\nwindows, carpeting, bricks, light fixtures,
\nceiling and floor tiles,wood,HVAC
\nequipment, and decorative items
\n(including fireplaces and stonework).
\nRecycling
\nRecycling is often easiest during
\nconstruction projects as opposed to
\ndemolition and renovation projects.
\nDuring construction, crews can source
\nseparate materials as debris is produced.
\nDemolition and renovation project
\nmaterials often consist of mixed materials
\nand require on- or off-site sorting.
\nTypical materials recycled from building
\nsites include metals, lumber, asphalt,
\nconcrete, roofing materials, corrugated
\ncardboard, and wallboard.
\nRecovering C&D Materials
\nThis fact sheet profiles building projects of four distinct types:
\nConstruction: Putting together all or part of a structure. Most construction
\nsite debris is generated from packaging and when raw materials are cut or
\nsized. Workers can save large scraps for use in other projects. Durable
\npackaging can be returned to suppliers. Smaller scraps and non-durable
\npackaging can be source separated when produced, and recycled.
\nRenovation: Partial removal of a building\u2019s interior and\/or exterior
\nfollowed by construction. Contractors can adapt the same recovery
\ntechniques as above for renovation projects.
\nDeconstruction: A \u201csoft\u201d demolition technique whereby workers dismantle
\na significant portion of a building in order to maximize recovery of materials
\nfor reuse and recycling.
\nDemolition: The complete removal of a building. On most demolition
\nprojects, after extracting easily removable materials for reuse or recycling,
\nworkers complete the demolition with sledgehammers, explosives, or heavy
\nequipment. Additional recyclables are often sorted from the rubble
\ngenerated during these demolition activities.
\nRecord-Setting
\nProgram
\nBagley Downs
\nApartments
\nEugene,OR
\nErickson\u2019s
\nDiversified
\nCorporate
\nHeadquarters
\nHudson,WI
\nFour Times
\nSquare
\nNew York,NY
\nMarion County
\nSenator Block
\nSalem, OR
\nRidgehaven
\nGreen Office
\nBuilding
\nSan Diego, CA
\nStowe Village
\nHartford, CT
\nWhole Foods
\nMarket
\nCorporate
\nHeadquarters
\nAustin,TX
\nModel Programs \u2014 Some Numbers and Descriptions
\nProject Highlights
\nThis project created 30 affordable housing
\nunits, saved the University of Oregon
\ndemolition costs, and preserved a community
\nlandmark.
\nErickson\u2019s planned to incorporate materials
\nrecovery efforts during the construction of its
\nnew corporate headquarters even though it
\nexpected to pay more than if it disposed all
\nmaterials generated. In fact, the company
\ndiverted 69% of the project debris and saved
\nmoney.
\nMaterials recovery was included in plans from
\nthe beginning. The contract included
\nrequirements that subcontractors reduce
\ndisposal and, as an incentive, they were
\nallowed to retain savings earned through
\navoided disposal costs and materials revenues.
\nMarion County and Salem Area Transit saved
\nover $160,000 by diverting demolition
\nmaterials from disposal while using the project
\nas a tool to educate the public on recycling.
\nThe county placed ads on TV and radio and
\nplaced banners illustrating the project
\nrecycling rate around the project site.
\nThe city of San Diego wanted to reduce,
\nrecycle, and reuse renovation materials from
\nthis project in order to comply with California\u2019s
\n50% recycling goal and reduce materials going
\nto the city-owned landfill. In addition to
\ndiverting 51% of the renovation materials from
\ndisposal, the city also saved $92,000.
\nThis demonstration project not only recovered
\n50% of the materials from six public housing
\nunits, it also trained nine public housing
\nresidents in deconstruction techniques.
\nRecovery of renovation materials saved Whole
\nFoods over $32,000. Reuse of materials, such as
\nceiling tiles, light fixtures, and doors, helped the
\ncompany avoid the purchase of nearly $25,000
\nworth of supplies. The company was also able
\nto take an $8,000 tax deduction for donating
\nsalvaged goods to non-profit organizations.
\nRecovery Strategy
\nEntire buildings saved by
\nmoving them to a new
\nlocation.
\nSource separation of
\nmaterials during
\nconstruction by all
\nsubcontractors.
\nPre-demolition salvage,
\nconstruction materials
\nsorted off-site because of
\nspace limitations.
\nSalvage of usable items
\nbefore demolition. Hand
\nand mechanical sorting of
\nmaterials after demolition
\nto recover metals, concrete,
\nand asphalt.
\nMany existing materials
\nrefurbished and reused.
\nMaterials sorted into
\nlabeled dumpsters for
\nrecycling.
\nBuildings hand-dismantled
\nto recover maximum usable
\nmaterials.
\nContracts required
\nrecycling and reuse.
\nMaterials stockpiled and
\nmoved about site for
\nstorage due to limited
\nspace.
\n% Debris
\nRecovered
\n(by weight)
\n73%
\n69%
\n58%
\n82%
\n51%
\n50%
\n42%
\nProject Type
\nDemolition and
\nconstruction
\nNew
\nconstruction
\nDemolition and
\nconstruction
\nDemolition
\nRenovation
\nDeconstruction
\nRenovation
\nStrategies for recovering construction and demolition materials
\nInclude C&D recovery plans
\nin the project design
\nSome recovery options may be lost if
\nnot considered at the project design
\nstage.
\nn Reuse of wall panels, ceiling panels, and
\ndoors in the Ridgehaven Office Building
\nrenovation was possible because the
\narchitect planned the new interior to use
\nthe same sizes and types of materials used
\nin the building before the renovation.
\nInclude recovery
\nrequirements and goals in
\nproject specifications and
\ncontracts
\nBy including recovery requirements and
\ngoals in project specifications and
\ncontracts, project planners can signal
\ntheir commitment to recovery and make
\nsubcontractors aware of their
\nresponsibilities from the project outset.
\nn In its contract,Marion County required its
\ndemolition contractor to divert materials
\nfrom area landfills. The county set a
\ndiversion goal of 90% based upon
\nresearch of other similar efforts.
\nn Although the general contractor for the
\nRidgehaven Office Building project was
\ninitially reluctant to recycle, its contract
\nrequired it to do so.
\nEducate contractors and
\ncrews on materials recovery
\ntechniques
\nEducating contractors and crews on
\nmaterials recovery techniques and
\nprocedures such as sorting and storage
\nmethods, recoverable materials, and
\nremoval techniques can eliminate
\ncontamination problems and increase
\nrecovery rates.
\nn The materials management plan created
\nfor the construction of Erickson\u2019s
\nDiversified\u2019s new headquarters building
\nprovided subcontractors with
\ndetailed instructions on reuse
\nand recycling techniques,
\nand sorting methods.
\nHold subcontractors
\naccountable for
\nmaterials recovery
\nIncorporating a mechanism to
\nenforce contract provisions requiring
\nmaterials recovery gives project
\nmanagers leverage to ensure efforts are
\na success.
\nn The Four Times Square project\u2019s
\nenvironmental consultant included
\ncontract requirements that construction
\ncontractors anticipate packaging materials
\ngenerated on the project,work to reduce
\nthem, and document their efforts. The
\nconstruction management firm
\nannounced it would withhold payments
\nunless the contractors complied with the
\ncontract requirements.
\nn Whole Foods did not process
\npayments to its general contractor until
\nthe contractor submitted forms
\nsummarizing its C&D debris recovery
\nefforts.
\nProvide incentives for
\nrecovery
\nProviding incentives to contractors and
\ncrews can create project buy-in.
\nn During the renovation of the Whole Foods
\nMarket Corporate Headquarters Building a
\nportion of revenue from materials sales
\nwas used to fund refreshments and a pizza
\nparty for the crew.
\nn As an incentive to encourage recovery, the
\nowners of the Four Times Square office
\nbuilding chose to allow their contractors
\nto retain revenues and savings from
\nmaterials recovery.
\nFollow up with contractors
\nand crews during the project
\nWithout feedback, contractors and
\ncrews may forget correct recovery
\nprocedures or grow lax about
\nimplementing them.
\nn Erickson\u2019s Diversified sent a representative
\nto weekly site meetings and its consultant
\ndistributed newsletters to crews in order
\nto monitor project progress and keep
\ncrews involved in recovery efforts.
\nThink outside the box
\nRecovery of C&D materials is a
\ngrowing field and offers
\nopportunities for creative
\nthinking.
\nn When the University of Oregon
\nplanned to demolish Bagley
\nDowns Apartments, Saint
\nVincent de Paul stepped
\nforward with the unique idea
\nof moving the buildings to a
\nnew location and renovating
\nthem. The University of
\nOregon avoided the costs of
\ndemolishing the buildings
\nand 30 affordable housing
\nunits were created for
\nabout half the cost of
\nbuilding new structures.
\nn The Hartford Housing Authority
\nundertook the deconstruction of six
\npublic housing units at Stowe Village as an
\nopportunity to train public housing
\nresidents in the building trades and
\nsimultaneously divert materials from
\ndisposal.
\nDeconstruction workers at the Stowe Village site
\nSource: Manafort Brothers, Inc.
\nQ How can I get my subcontractors
\nto recover C&D materials?
\nA Include contract requirements that
\nsubcontractors recover project
\nmaterials. Also incorporate an
\nenforcement mechanism. For example,
\nmake contract payments due only after
\nyour subcontractors provide
\ndocumentation of their recovery efforts.
\nQ How can I determine what is
\nrecyclable or reusable?
\nA A little research should help you
\nidentify what materials to
\ntarget for recovery. You can
\ntalk to others in the
\nbuilding trades to learn
\nwhat they have done on
\nsimilar projects. State and local
\ngovernments often publish directories
\nof recyclers and the materials they
\naccept. Also, check the telephone
\ndirectory for recyclers and used
\nbuilding materials stores. It may be
\neasier to rely on professional advice.
\nBuilding site materials management
\nfirms and companies specializing in
\nC&D materials recovery operate in some
\nregions and for a fee can handle some
\nor all materials from your site. Another
\noption is to hire a consultant who is
\nfamiliar with local conditions to draft a
\nmaterials management plan for your
\nproject.
\nQ How can I get my crews to
\nproperly recover materials?
\nA Constant education and feedback
\nare necessary to ensure on-site
\nsorting and recovery efforts are
\nsuccessful. Regular meetings among
\nclient, contractors, and crews provide
\nopportunities to communicate project
\nsuccesses and areas for improvement.
\nAlso consider providing incentives to
\ncrews as a reward for their efforts.
\nCrews may be more enthusiastic about
\na program if they benefit personally
\nfrom it.
\nQ How can communities prevent
\nbuildings from being demolished
\nwithout materials recovery?
\nA Some localities have incorporated
\nmaterials recovery requirements as
\npart of the permit process. Another
\noption is to pass a local ordinance
\nrequiring recovery of C&D materials.
\nFor example, Portland,Oregon, passed
\nan ordinance, effective January 1, 1996,
\nrequiring job-site recycling on all
\nconstruction projects with a value
\nexceeding $25,000. Localities could
\npass similar ordinances requiring
\nrecovery of demolition materials.
\nQ Won\u2019t my costs increase because
\nsalvage and recycling are more
\nlabor-intensive than disposal?
\nA Not necessarily. The costs of labor
\nto salvage and recycle should be
\nweighed against the
\navoided costs to haul and
\ndispose of materials, and
\nthe value of materials
\nthat are recovered.
\nMaterials recovery
\noften proves to be more
\ncost-effective than disposal.
\nQ How important is it to keep
\nmaterials separate on the job
\nsite?
\nA Very important. Materials
\nintended for salvage or reuse can
\nbe damaged or destroyed if not
\nproperly stored. Even a small amount of
\nother materials in a bin of recyclables
\ncan make the entire bin unacceptable
\nfor recycling.
\nConstruction and Demolition Materials Recovery
\nSome Questions and Answers
\nLabeled containers for source-separated
\nC&D materials.
\nMarion County recovered bricks from its
\nSenator block demolition and gave them
\naway free to local citizens.
\nTips From Record-Setters
\nn Ensure that the client and design
\nteam share the same environmental goals.
\nn Establish a clear numerical waste
\nreduction goal for the project.
\nn At minimum, choose a general
\ncontractor and subcontractors who can
\ndemonstrate commitment to reducing
\ndisposal.
\nn Involve the general contractor early in
\nthe design process.
\nn Include environmental procedures in
\nthe project specifications that address
\nconstruction materials reuse and recycling.
\nn Require contractors to estimate waste
\ngenerated on site, including
\npackaging, so you can
\nanticipate the nature and
\namount of the recyclable
\nmaterials that will be generated
\non site.
\nn Host a pre-construction
\nmeeting and site meetings early
\nin the construction process in
\norder to educate the contractor
\nand workers on the benefits of materials
\nrecovery.
\nn Encourage communication among the
\nclient, project facilitators, and contractors
\nover the course of the entire project.
\nn Create recycling and disposal
\nreduction incentives for the construction
\ncrew such as pizza parties.
\nn Do not over-complicate materials
\nhandling guidelines.
\nn Carefully coordinate reuse of smaller
\nmaterials such as door hardware.
\nn Carefully track all data on materials
\nrecovery and communicate the results to
\nall involved parties.
\nn Provide source reduction,
\nreuse, and recycling forms to
\nproject managers and waste
\nhaulers to make data reporting easier.
\nTips for Municipal Planners
\nto Promote C&D Recycling
\nn Consider incorporating requirements
\nfor recycling of C&D debris in your permit
\nprocess.
\nn Use the projects as a promotion to
\nraise awareness about recycling.
\nResources
\nOrganizations:
\nConstruction Materials Recycling Association (CMRA)
\nPO Box 644, Lisle, Illinois 60532
\n630-548-4510
\nNational Association of Home Builders (NAHB) Research Center
\n400 Prince George\u2019s Boulevard, Upper Marlboro,Maryland 20772-8731
\n301-249-4000 <http:\/\/www.nahbrc.com>
\nUsed Building Materials Association (UBMA)
\n1096 Queen Street, Suite 126, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 2R9
\n877-221-UBMA (8262) <http:\/\/www.ubma.org>
\nPublications:
\nBuilding for the Future: Strategies to Reduce Construction and Demolition Waste in
\nMunicipal Projects, INFORM, Inc.: 120 Wall Street,New York, New York 10005-4001
\n212-361-2400
\nConstruction Resources: A Waste Reduction Guide for Wisconsin\u2019s Builders and
\nContractors, University of Wisconsin Extension, Solid and Hazardous Waste Education
\nCenter: 610 Langdon Street, Room 527,Madison, Wisconsin 53703
\n608-262-0385
\nResidential Construction Waste Management: A Builder\u2019s Field Guide and Waste
\nManagement and Recovery: A Remodeler’s Field Guide, NAHB Research Center (contact
\ninformation listed above)
\nResource Efficient Building – A Handbook for Building Owners,Designers and Project
\nManagers, Portland Metro: 600 NE Grand Avenue, Portland,Oregon 97232-2736
\n503-797-1650
\nWastespec: Model Specifications for Construction Waste Reduction, Reuse,
\nand Recycling,Triangle J Council of Governments: P.O. Box 12276, Research Triangle
\nPark, North Carolina 27709
\n919-558-9343
\nWebsites:
\nKing County,Washington\u2019s Encompass site <http:\/\/www.metrokc.gov\/market\/map>
\nThe Smart Growth Network <http:\/\/www.smartgrowth.org>
\nThe California Integrated Waste Management Board
\n<http:\/\/www.ciwmb.ca.gov\/ConDemo>
\nThe Waste Reduction
\nRecord-Setters Project
\nwas developed under a
\nU.S. EPA grant by the Institute for Local
\nSelf-Reliance (ILSR).For more information
\non the project, contact ILSR, 2425 18th
\nStreet,NW,Washington, DC 20009,
\nphone (202) 232-4108, fax (202) 332-
\n0463,Web site <http:\/\/www.ilsr.org>.
\nNote
\n1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
\nCharacterization of Building-Related
\nConstruction and Demolition Debris in the
\nUnited States, (EPA530-R-98-010), 1998,
\np. 2-11.<\/p>\n
\nSt Augustine\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 St Johns County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-824-7144
\nOrange Park\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Clay County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-264-6444
\nJacksonville Beaches\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Duval County\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0904-246-3969
\nFernandina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nassau County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-277-3040
\nMacclenny\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Baker County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 904-259-5091
\nPalm Coast\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Flagler County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 386-439-5290
\nDaytona\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Volusia County\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 386-253-4911<\/p>\n
\nServing all of Florida \u00a0and Georgia\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 at \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0904-346-1266<\/p>\n